mjb

56 ms·

1. 571.▲
   by mjb 16y ago

   I haven't seen the rest before, but the Cleveland and McGill paper is excellent, and well worth the read. They make some very interesting conclusions about the effectiveness of commonly used graph types, and concrete recommendations for alt
2. 572.▲
   by mjb 16y ago

   > You cannot passively detect another passive receiver. In general, there isn't really such a thing as a passive receiver. The typical radar receiver design will downmix the incoming signal to some lower frequency (IF) using its 'local
3. 573.▲
   by mjb 16y ago

   > Additionally, you're leaving the challenge of building the actual Radar Detection to well established companies who know what they are doing. This is probably going to become more and more important in future. Both RF and processing e
4. 574.▲
   by mjb 16y ago

   SAR is indeed a great use for this kind of platform, but the equipment needed to do really high-quality work might be too bulky for this platform. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission equipment ( http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/images/photos/
5. 575.▲
   by mjb 16y ago

   Optimisation for stealth against bistatic and multistatic radar systems is a different problem from the monostatic case. The important thing is the split between the position of the transmitter and receiver. In the monostatic (transmitter a