Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mistercheph
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
Yeah I wouldn't hope for that to be smooth/possible, others probably have stricter needs but IMO as long something indicates what github name "said" something, the most important part is preserving the context of why dec
62.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
Yeah guys, if it's encrypted by default, it's not a violation of user security or privacy expectations to have a set of master keys that you hold onto and give to third parties to decrypt user devices. I mean it was just encrypted
63.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
Awesome work! Just curious, has anyone worked on a tool for migrating github "collaborations"/ social artifacts to radicle, I'm confident this will be solved eventually as existing projects with treasured social artifact
64.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
Just like the MPAA is having people arrested for torrenting films? It doesn't scale well unless there's a centralized entity you can go after that controls distribution.
65.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
P2P Github
66.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
I think the recently introduced -fit option which is on by default means it's no longer necesary to -ngl, can also probably drop -c which is "0" by default and reads metadata from the gguf to get the model's advertised c
67.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
I want more customers like you, eat your slop and say thank you.
68.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
A coding agent is just a massive RCE, what do you think happens when claude gets prompt injected? Although I don't defend not fixing an RCE. Absolutely all coding agents should be run in sandboxed containers, 24/7, if you do other
69.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
Woah didn't realize this was the default, turning this off, thanks!
70.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
Code you run on your machine outside of a browser sandbox vs content served by an HTTP endpoint to your machine.
71.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
With reproducible builds, and the way most people get packages, from their package manager: No.
72.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
You can work around the Widevine issues by pirating the content you're interested in.
73.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
No source code? That's pretty disappointing, and makes it DOA for most Linux users.
74.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
"1 is the product of zero [prime] factors" This seems to be circular since it assumes that 1 is not prime
75.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
People are willing to pay for value delivery and innovation, neither of which are even attempted in this device-, this is just reskinning and rent-seeking.
76.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
If trying to hawk a subscription-based closed-source fork of open source software as privacy preserving or being "Swiss-made" weren't sufficient red flags, search the web for MP02, their last phone. Basic functionality like c
77.
▲
by
mistercheph
9mo ago
I agree, this is why I also consider Windows barely working, I had to install 7 then 8 then 10 then 11 what's next? It should just turn on and work stop changing it around and making me install different random crap to get it working.
78.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
Too bad, so sad for the Mister Krabs secret recipe-pilled labs. Shy of something fundamental changing, it will always be possible to make a distillation that is 98% as good as a frontier model for ~1% of the cost of training the SOTA model.
79.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
It depends on what "premium"/"luxury" mean to you. For some, red leather that has been masterfully tanned and stitched lining the interior of their car is premium. For others, the ability to transport you hundreds o
80.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
You are a digital serf, dependent on the good will and love of a lord that gives you access in exchange for a tax. I really wish free(libre) tools existed that allowed you to do your work. Hopefully they will in the future, I am sure someon
81.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
Use Linux
82.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
> Whenever you talk about scientific of scholarly work without talking to the people who do the work you are on the outside You are ignoring what I said and just reasserting your hegemonic view of scholarly institutions / scientifi
83.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
Aside from doubts about whether or not this is actually the case the pertinent question that comes from my point is: If cryptography researchers were keeping their results secret to within their institution / research circle, instead o
84.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
It doesn't require reciprocation because it is a generalized version of the rebasing problem in software. Over a big round table with cigar smoke in the air it's natural to come to the conclusion that the closed party can always o
85.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
Why would the nation that implemented the one-child policy be unable to implement a three child policy?
86.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
Controversial take: Democracy and the US are awful at keeping secrets, and are incapable of winning by an information delta, if we followed your strategy we would surely be doomed. Our greatest advantages come when we work in the open, an
87.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
The archeologists are already adding fake detail, just at a different level of abstraction. Did they constrain themselves to only painting in the places where they find remnants of pigment? No, otherwise there would be gaps, cracks, and ran
88.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
Who is inside and who is outside depends on your (subjective) spatial interpretation of the situation. It could just as well be said that a bunch of scholars disconnected from the culture, history, and technique of fine arts (except as obje
89.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
Sorry, didn't realize.
90.
▲
by
mistercheph
10mo ago
Whether intentionally or unintentionally, these researchers have cultivated a public perception that the classical statues we admire looked totally ridiculous and were actually hideous. It is difficult to interpret it as unintentional, when
More ›