misslibby

9 ms·

31.
by misslibby 4y ago
You can back up your data from Huawei phones, too. Apple had plans to scan the photos on your phone and automatically report you to the police if the algorithm thinks something is off. I wouldn't trust them at all.
32.
by misslibby 4y ago
I think I cut undercut their price for producing a movie nobody wants to see every day.
33.
by misslibby 4y ago
The magic is in the "strategies"? How does it do that? And does it have a memory between test runs?
34.
by misslibby 4y ago
I don't understand what benefit the hypothesis library gives here? Why can't you just generate values without hypothesis and call the test function with your values "manually"?
35.
by misslibby 4y ago
As a counterpoint, my kid was playing a game on Roblox that taught them basics of avoiding fraud before allowing them to play. It was a game about trading animals. It is not all bad.
36.
by misslibby 4y ago
"I also read that report, but I got a different vibe from it than you did." You read the 1000 pages? Respect! But is it even "science" or just a bunch of predictions? "The doomsday scenarios will come to pass if we
37.
by misslibby 4y ago
How is it not science? Of course that is also science. Can you point out something where he broke your rule of using scientific methods? All he did so far was provide some data points. The "real" scientists should be able to expla
38.
by misslibby 4y ago
" the evidence for human influenced climate is so vast and so well researched that it would take an absolute miracle to displace it at this point." Even now there are various scenarios, not a single consensus. And I rather doubt t
39.
by misslibby 4y ago
I am not the one making grandiose claims about curability of cancer. Have you ever even looked at the IPCC report?
40.
by misslibby 4y ago
Sure - but then how do you verify that some alleged scientist has been doing that, if you are not allowed/worthy of checking their work?
41.
by misslibby 4y ago
I looked into the source of the 99% claims before, and in general, they don't say what you claim they say. They may find that most scientists agree that humans have an impact on climate, but that doesn't mean they agree on the doo
42.
by misslibby 4y ago
"And this is just the measurements part: There is also the problem of predatory journals etc etc. - all of these can skew the "consensus" if you don't account for them." But doesn't this very sentence from you
43.
by misslibby 4y ago
I did not get the impression that "it's complicated" is the usual way to introduce it. The usual way is to claim billions of scientists allegedly agree and it is supposedly settled science. "Also, the IPCC put out a like
44.
by misslibby 4y ago
The "environmental scientists and academics" in question have probably also been accused of bad science by their opponents. And who gets to decide who is the scientist in that debate? Shellenberger and Lomborg have presumable stud
45.
by misslibby 4y ago
Nobody is a scientist, it is all just people.
46.
by misslibby 4y ago
Don't you think it is weird that people who try to do their own research end up in the "happy to ignore science" camp, as you put it? I don't think they "ignore science", they just realize it is a lot more comp
47.
by misslibby 4y ago
You are merely constructing an idealized authoritarian elite of scientists whom nobody can question because allegedly their craft is too complicated for mere mortals. Sorry, but no. A lot of people have an academic education, for example, a
48.
by misslibby 4y ago
How big is the enormous body of scientific work?
49.
by misslibby 4y ago
Are you sure the usual doomsday predictions are much more complicated?
50.
by misslibby 4y ago
But local changes of environment would have been expected to increase temperature readings? More asphalt, more buildings...
51.
by misslibby 4y ago
So one out of several billion elderly people. Nice, but not really a proven concept. My father used to be a doctor in a place that got converted into a pedestrians only area, he reported that a lot of people had issues. Business for other s
52.
by misslibby 4y ago
I live in a big city, so I see a lot of elderly people. But especially the ones who are not mobile anymore you probably see less. If they were using those tricycle things, I would certainly see them at least some times.
53.
by misslibby 4y ago
I don't see any elderly people using them. Nice thought, but I am not convinced.
54.
by misslibby 4y ago
Yeah, there must have been a reason the colleague came up with that obscure historical person, certainly not random.
55.
by misslibby 4y ago
I'm a European and I have very little trust in European governments. Not much trust in the US government, either.
56.
by misslibby 4y ago
What do you mean, those old people's motor rollers? I am not convinced.
57.
by misslibby 4y ago
There are a lot of elderly people, though. I know it causes issues. Not saying it can't be solved, but it is naive to say that simply banning cars is always a net plus. Why did people living in the city even buy cars to begin with?
58.
by misslibby 4y ago
Problem for elderly and sick people who need cars to get around.
59.
by misslibby 4y ago
By buying existing stock you help create a functioning market, which in turn helps other people make investments. That they can sell their stock in the future factors into investment decisions. Therefore imp it is incorrect to say buying ex
60.
by misslibby 4y ago
Do you disagree that the monetary policies of the FED messed up the economy? How is that OK? The point of Bitcoin is literally decentralization. Centralization is control and anti-freedom.

More ›