mirekrusin

6 ms·

61.
by mirekrusin 2mo ago
Progress is defined by capability data points over time that we have plenty where AGI is a threshold ie. stuff like METR [0] and dozens of others. [0] https://metr.org/time-horizons
62.
by mirekrusin 2mo ago
I think we have more than 1 data point for AI progress.
63.
by mirekrusin 2mo ago
There is no reliable evidence they won’t. Look at rate of progress, not today’s capabilities alone. The gap is shrinking, many tasks are already performed at super human level. Humanity doesn’t have monopoly on intelligence - it seems obvio
64.
by mirekrusin 2mo ago
Great to see Meta back, looks like really strong, local model, can't wait for llama.cpp support.
65.
by mirekrusin 2mo ago
There is literally not a single comment like this, the only off topic comment like this is yours.
66.
by mirekrusin 2mo ago
Modern data centers can be designed with near-zero direct water consumption. It isn’t fundamentally necessary to consume huge amounts of water to cool computers. What’s the story with those new data centers? Do they actually choose to do ev
67.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
Layoffs would be a poor indicator that recursive self-improvement had occurred as you need people with knowledge around domain/layer the work is done on. Also, if the lab truly has a self-improving superintelligence, the cost of retain
68.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
It's 680 commits old.
69.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
They can sleep just fine being the only player in town actually not loosing subsidized money.
70.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
I’ll keep checking.
71.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
Musk didn’t sign it. nVidia did and they released good models – same with Meta, Microsoft, IBM, Mistral – all are signatories.
72.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
You forgot to include link to your tool.
73.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
They should codename next open model "flux capacitor". Capability to travel in time is real issue as well as ability of open models to easily attack fable and sol - models which are completely defenseless.
74.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
OpenAI is more... open. Maybe that's what they wanted to communicate.
75.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
They're not training on your data, they're training on "please anonymise this conversation" data.
76.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
Unsubsidised token prices that people would actually pay for is a fantasy.
77.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
Not paying anything feels off – it should be more evaluated against making it public information at the time of discovery until ie. public patch release, it doesn't feel right that the response is "trust us bro, we knew about it,
78.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
Sound legit to me as long as it's prompted to use hardcoded "dario amodei".
79.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
Isn't leaking browser extension used by one of people on the team (doesn't need to be developer, could be qa or anybody with whom the access was shared) more plausible?
80.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
And now you’re ready to level up with motorbike jump.
81.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
It's simple: close weights = not welcome.
82.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
Open weight models should have GPL-like license where it says if you train model on it, it needs to be open weight as well.
83.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
Give it few years and they'll get LED colors and we'll see them in "I'm lovin it" formation.
84.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
it's not overpriced but high-priced looking from other countries and mostly not a markup, normal considering median wages.
85.
by mirekrusin 3mo ago
In others it's pizza night for family or half a bill for sushi dinner, so what?
86.
by mirekrusin 4mo ago
What's the difference between this and Public Domain/CC0 from PoV of labs and vibers?
87.
by mirekrusin 4mo ago
Closed weight models are a result of philanthropy by some private investors.
88.
by mirekrusin 4mo ago
"for the benefit of all humanity *" * with big pockets
89.
by mirekrusin 4mo ago
Banning models in US just strengthens competing states, ie. China.
90.
by mirekrusin 4mo ago
Yes, exactly, quite shocking, if something like this is true, as NSA (!!) director you keep it quiet, right?

More ›