mimikatz

39 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   You're not accounting for adaptation, which nature is very good at.
2. 152.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   Sorry, I misunderstood your question. I thought you asked did they really have that much, not did they pay their people more. I assume they did not because they still have a huge bankroll.
3. 153.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   They did. It is not in dispute. It would at least be hypocritical. It's up to each person what that means.
4. 154.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   The Brookings Institute who published this have $435,964,000 in net assets. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2020-an... Couldn't they pay their people more?
5. 155.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   I'm starting to think the company I work for might just be in it for the money.
6. 156.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   What’s an example of a division that AWS subsidizes particularly heavily? Prime Video, for one. Jeff loves Prime Video because it gives him access to the social scene in LA and New York. He’s newly divorced and the richest man in the world.
7. 157.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   I used to love this product. They explicitly told users to go away a couple years ago. These updates still pale to the old functionality and I am not putting my data back into Google Finance because at some point they will get tired of supp
8. 158.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   Solarwinds was dumb, but this definitely was an advanced attacker who hit FireEye, DHS, and Treasury. They had ownership of over 18,000 solarwinds servers and went after 10 or less orgs. When they did, the attacks they used were complex. It
9. 159.▲
   by mimikatz 6y ago

   Is this what esteemed PhD AI ethicists spend their time on? It sounds like a useless grad school paper. I think much less of everyone now.
10. 160.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    Do all doctors need residency or is it another barrier to having enough cheap doctors?
11. 161.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    That isn't a very neutral headline...
12. 162.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    We had this set up for America under TPP, which Trump rejected and Hillary claimed she would as well after being pushed that way from the left.
13. 163.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    "This isn't us" - Company that wrote the document.
14. 164.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxFQYw_MmAA
15. 165.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    Didn't Reddit not too long ago fire everyone who wouldn't move to SF?
16. 166.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    It is strange watching average America look at a common IT Issue. There was a Fiber cut. It brought down a network. This happens frequently. Timing sucks, but the average person never sees this so they jump to conspiracies and malicious int
17. 167.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    It is pretty clearly #2 and I don't know why people are acting confused. He got a huge loan at roughly 0% and the main risk to mitigate is a currency risk. Investing in stable Japanese companies heavily reduces that risk and growth&#x2
18. 168.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    This is very on point to how large companies operate.
19. 169.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    Look, this might have its use cases for experienced user, but is really dangerous and harmful for the average user. It should not be pushed as a more stable secure version.
20. 170.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    You can Dox a person who posts under their name and uses their picture?
21. 171.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    I hate the journalist trend that conflates the act of breaking parole with that of the cause of going to jail. It is misleading and disingenuous. They should do better.
22. 172.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    Better diversity is the effect of a well run company not the cause.
23. 173.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    I completely agree. Two other big causes of problems that I never see brought up are. Clear rules about what is allowed/causes a response. You routinely hear protesters complain we did nothing and the police started firing tear gas or
24. 174.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    This is really interesting, it is the important parts about local government we don't usually see (RIP real local news). It would be a really good experiment to try other ways of policing. Police have a lot of levers to push government
25. 175.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    I made a comment the other day that I thought Twitter was selectively enforcing this policy (I lost Karma pointing it out). I didn't want to assume so I tested. I reported 10 people who called for Trump to be killed or had other calls
26. 176.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    In the 80s the legitimate media covered lizardman spottings https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lizard_Man_of_Scape_Ore_Swam... . I don’t think this is unusual.
27. 177.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    Why lie? The guyt threated people, but was not unharmed and his car was burned. https://twitter.com/MsDBZbabe/status/1266904275785056262?s=2...
28. 178.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    I feel really disconnected from what is the online mainstream thought. Trump is a huge embarrassment and this tweet should never come from our president. Twitter is doing some real selective enforcement that doesn't seem even handed or
29. 179.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    This is exactly what I am getting at. Does it prove otherwise? Can Twitter know the state of truth about this? Should we tag every post saying OJ did it with information about the trial and that he was proven innocent? What about posts abou
30. 180.▲
    by mimikatz 6y ago

    I agree with Zuckerberg. Fact checking isn't possible as most of these things aren't "facts" twitter can prove or disprove. The illegal or threat of harm test seems like a much more reasonable one.