Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
milkshakes
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
milkshakes
6mo ago
it's free code. if you're so concerned about the quality, you can read it yourself.
62.
▲
by
milkshakes
6mo ago
are you talking about the same public that voted in our current clowns? no thank you
63.
▲
by
milkshakes
6mo ago
those are interpreters, the language is interpreted by a binary called `ruby` or `python`, for example, so that happens to be the process that's requesting the permission
64.
▲
by
milkshakes
7mo ago
even more amazing then
65.
▲
by
milkshakes
7mo ago
here appears to be his celebration of his victory, pretty catchy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM8Ee6pcXvQ
66.
▲
by
milkshakes
8mo ago
what about "sports betting"
67.
▲
by
milkshakes
8mo ago
you really believe that gemini by google will not run ads? https://arxiv.org/html/2512.03975v1
68.
▲
by
milkshakes
8mo ago
this is exactly what they do, if you pay for your account, you don't see ads
69.
▲
by
milkshakes
9mo ago
highly common
70.
▲
by
milkshakes
9mo ago
i don't have any problems with credit, i am just answering the question
71.
▲
by
milkshakes
9mo ago
credit utilization is a factor in credit scores, which are important for things like mortgages and auto loans. higher credit limit, ceteris paribus, is lower utilization
72.
▲
by
milkshakes
11mo ago
how much does an ai researcher make per year though?
73.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
they kidnapped the wrong person https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnapping_of_Wang_Xing
74.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
ChatGPT Monday has you covered
75.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
yubikeys already know who they are authenticating to. the relying party is verified as part of the FIDO2/CTAP2 protocol
76.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
while those are obviously huge dependencies, i think the claim was about _python_ dependencies
77.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
to put it bluntly, the game has changed. what you knew from before is not correct now. if you keep applying your previous intuition and experience to a job search in todays market, you are going to be in for a hard time.
78.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
also fake workers were much less of a thing as well
79.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
what percentage of the online population do you expect to understand this?
80.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
don't worry -- they have big plans! https://research.google/blog/mechanism-design-for-large-lang...
81.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
What was the oversight? How did you correct it?
82.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
everything is obvious after the fact, yet still it was meta who made the contributions. and meta who made them stick. what other company has contributed more widespread, enduring, and game changing open source projects than meta? asking ser
83.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
> Meta seems like one of the few large tech companies where if the whole company vanished, the world would be purely a better place. This is what I disagree with. Specifically, I don't disagree that Meta has caused serious harm. I j
84.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
with the exception of maybe llama, each of these releases represented not only solid, accessible implementations, but actually also a paradigm shift and a massive investment. then they gave each away for free, and continued to invest in the
85.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
reminds me of this: https://www.reddit.com/r/LifeProTips/comments/5jdzsx/lpt_use...
86.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
I disagree. Among Meta's many technical contributions: React PyTorch osquery GraphQL Presto/Trino RocksDB Jest OCP Llama
87.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
Oh, they know, that's why they have banned all other AI from interacting with Slack.
88.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
unless there is something going on behind the scenes, like an astroturfing signal, this seems like a pretty weak justification for the heavy handed moderation actions taken. it seems at face value like you might have killed an organic front
89.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
well, you're in luck, they are JWTs in fact. JWTs in JWTs, so extra secure.
90.
▲
by
milkshakes
1y ago
it seems your concerns are addressed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45285280 why has this post been taken off the front page, and why has the title been editorialized?
More ›