Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mike741
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mike741
3y ago
"In other words" why not address their actual words? Youtube is giving us something we value, but that does not justify any given demand Youtube comes up with. There's nothing noble about blindly accepting the terms of a mono
62.
▲
by
mike741
3y ago
and? the changes are either worth it or they aren't. if they're not worth it then don't make them.
63.
▲
by
mike741
3y ago
they are sharing how they feel. you are not forced to read them.
64.
▲
by
mike741
3y ago
the closest alternative to Youtube I have seen is Odysee (formerly known as LBRY) https://odysee.com/ it reminds me of the old youtube experience. I like that their ads are images and banners rather than video interruptions
65.
▲
by
mike741
3y ago
can you link a specific example? youtube's anti-piracy measures are quite strict in my experience.
66.
▲
by
mike741
3y ago
>> I absolutely see humans as being more special than machine > Can you explain why exactly? Because humans designed and built machines before machines could design and build humans.
67.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
I recognize that you were not trying to allude to the countless times where the limitation of rights were used to cause harm. I also recognize that good and bad justifications are not the same thing. My thinking is simply that there are bet
68.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
What I've thrown into the mix is a suspension of human rights that was claimed to be for the purpose of protection but in reality caused harm. It wasn't simply "unethical research." If HIV and Syphilis are the best examp
69.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
Irrelevant to a response regarding both the importance of human rights and the spread of syphilis? I can't imagine an instance where it would be more relevant, I'd be interested to hear why it's not though.
70.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
Not the best example. We live in a society that intentionally infected 600 African American men with syphilis, without their consent, simply to see what happens despite knowing effective treatment already existed. Nice concept indeed.
71.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
> Oh yeah, and those same people later cry foul when they get robbed of their money because it was not protected in any way. Can you give an example? Do you actually know any of these people? > Suddenly everybody wants crypto but with
72.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
You still have to not only synthesize the answers these models return, but now also first analyze the answers for the relevant parts, and then perform searches to validate them.
73.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
right, which is why humans do not claim to "grasp the significance" of their moves.
74.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
everyone makes mistakes, but not everyone makes the same mistakes. depending on their mistake, players very much can and do conclude a lack of relevant understanding. this conclusion is an integral part of the learning process.
75.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
it seems that way until the AI makes a mistake that even inexperienced players would be able to spot & avoid using traditional principles
76.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
Well by that standard, the other articles should have been "Man helps machine beat man at Go."
77.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
where did they claim to be healthy?
78.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
If the first 19,000 updates weren't secure, I don't have much confidence the next one will be. Is Linux any different in this regard?
79.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
I've heard of Proton a few times but last time I checked only 600 out of Steam's 50,000+ games are compatible with it. Not bad by any means but using an older Windows version still seems to offer more at the moment.
80.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
There are also bash scripts to stop Windows from force-updating. Its a lot less work than switching to an entirely new OS and doesn't require giving up video games. But if someone can afford to learn Linux, or any OS that doesn't
81.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
isn't it commonly used in court by lawyers and police investigations?
82.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
What is the questioners line of reasoning if they haven't made any claims? If they have made a mixture of claims and questions then they can have flaws but its misleading to call them "questioners" at that point, since they&#
83.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
"a plus" depends on who you are. For someone who profits off of inflation, its certainly not a plus. I said it does a better job limiting supply and preventing inflation and that is a fact not an assumption. The supply has been
84.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
I agree with that definition of inflation, so how hasn't it prevented inflation? Has the supply of bitcoins ever deviated from the intended rate? If it hasn't deviated from that rate then the supply, and thus the involuntary compo
85.
▲
by
mike741
4y ago
> The proper question is what does cryptocurrency do better than alternatives? Bitcoin, as one example, does a better job limiting supply and preventing inflation than its fiat alternatives. Of course, this doesn't make the article
86.
▲
by
mike741
5y ago
Computers as a whole burn the energy of many small industrialized nations. Is that to say computers shouldn't be used? Or is it simply a statement of how widely used computers are?
87.
▲
by
mike741
5y ago
This reminds me of the stories about Edison electrocuting elephants as a means of demonstrating the "danger" of alternating current. Bad Application =/= Bad Technology Most telephone calls are scam calls, it doesn't mean
88.
▲
by
mike741
5y ago
All of those problems existed before Bitcoin, so Bitcoin evidently did not "bring them to the table" And if Bitcoin is not a store of value, why are the Bitcoin I own seemingly maintaining (and increasing) their original value?
89.
▲
by
mike741
5y ago
These criticisms are not limited to just online polls. One advantage that online polls have is a larger sample size. Gallop polls, for example, tend to have an extremely small sample size of less than 2,000 people while an online poll can r
90.
▲
by
mike741
5y ago
That 2nd sentence is incorrect. The blockchain is already the 3rd party attesting to the NFT's legitimacy. The purpose of the decentralized blockchain is to remove the need for 3rd party validation. Yes the NFT can be copied, and yes t
More ›