mike10010100

8 ms·

31.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> There aren't that many public platforms with any reach Okay? Private organizations are under no obligation to provide you with a platform to spread your message. If you want, you can start your own social network or host your own
32.
by mike10010100 8y ago
...and yet white nationalists are still free to set their own social network up or use networks that don't care, like Voat for example. That's called freedom of association: the right for an organization or individual to not wish
33.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> the censorship problem also exists for leftists outlets that are left of the neoliberal centrist view of the D.C. Democratic Party. Which ones, specifically?
34.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> I can give you hundreds of examples of people being accused of being a white nationalist without any merit to it. Feel free to do so whenever. Be sure to indicate when that has resulted in serious consequences for the "victim&quot
35.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> They aren't really required to work. They're allowed to quit. They're just required to work if they want to keep the job I'm not really required to breathe, but if I don't, I'll stop living. So...yeah...
36.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> No one is entitled to income, a job, or having others pay for their expenses. So no life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness for these folks? Got it.
37.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> Not about this being the most significant factor. It absolutely is suggested, if not implicitly then by omission. > They also had influence over this particular issue, unlike the macroeconomics of China. Right, but the more it'
38.
by mike10010100 8y ago
It's also important to note that China is generally experiencing a harsh economic slowdown. https://theweek.com/speedreads/815565/data-reportedly-signal... It would seem that this issue is far broader than si
39.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> In the bigger picture Trump has decided that a trade war with China is a good idea, so of course there are going to be unpleasant consequences. There is also a massive slowdown of the Chinese economy that doesn't seem to have anyt
40.
by mike10010100 8y ago
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills considering how many people are completely ignoring the very obvious connotation here. It's like they're willfully ignoring the Chinese market issue entirely.
41.
by mike10010100 8y ago
Yes, he literally did. Right here: > - Some people decide that they'll stick with their phone a bit longer than they otherwise would have, reducing iPhone sales. > - Apple misses their earnings target, likely costing them more in
42.
by mike10010100 8y ago
What exactly does this have to do with the comment you're replying to?
43.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> That's pretty solid, and far from "inconclusive." It's literally what he said: "inconclusive, needs more study".
44.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> It helped in the beginning, but most of them just became addicted, paranoid and incredible slow thinkers and figuratively numb. Depression itself leads to all of those things. Your anecdote is not data.
45.
by mike10010100 8y ago
This exactly. Right now we have correlation. A ton of people in this thread are trying to divine causation.
46.
by mike10010100 8y ago
What a wonderful Gish Gallop. Thanks for letting me be another in your long line of intellectually dishonest copypasta responses. Keep on pushing conspiracy theories like the "deep state"!
47.
by mike10010100 8y ago
So the fact that he's peddling basic fear mongering doesn't put you off in any way?
48.
by mike10010100 8y ago
So now you're excusing his behavior because it's "expected"? Maybe now is the moment we stop giving him the time of day.
49.
by mike10010100 8y ago
It really is a shitty article, with very few sources and tons of FUD.
50.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> The scientific basis is that electromagnetic fields alter biological processes That's not a basis, that's an assumption. An assumption that must be proved though double-blind trials. An assumption that has never held water th
51.
by mike10010100 8y ago
A study that was literally published this week? Wake me up when it's been peer-reviewed and replicated.
52.
by mike10010100 8y ago
This. People claiming that cell phone signals cause cancer or other ill health effects are crackpots, nothing more, nothing less. The claims simply don't make sense. Non-ionizing EM radiation has absolutely no documented effects on hum
53.
by mike10010100 8y ago
Then why not enunciate your argument and have a productive conversation instead of relying on logical fallacies?
54.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> However, an artist and a scientist are going to see literally the exact same thing when they pass by the moon But only the artist will be able to paint it into a beautiful work that can be a cultural icon for centuries. > It's
55.
by mike10010100 8y ago
This also happens to me. Evidently my FiOS IP looks European despite the fact that I live near NYC...
56.
by mike10010100 8y ago
Yes, because nothing says "fix public transit" like electing a Libertarian.
57.
by mike10010100 8y ago
Precisely. Her value stems from her efforts to shift the Overton window, not from the chance she will win.
58.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> He makes observation of women's preferences, based on data. He then prescribes things based on that generalization that make implicit claims about the ability of women to work without said compensation.
59.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> The conclusion you’ve made in this and previous comments is about abilities. This is the conclusion the author of the memo reaches as well. His suggestions are not to fix the culture surrounding these preferences, but instead to simply
60.
by mike10010100 8y ago
> Hence the identity threat to the conservatives. You are free to believe whatever you want. Just be prepared for your ideology to be called out for what it is if you choose to publicly stand for it.

More ›