migf

7 ms·

61.
by migf 4y ago
The thing is, people want to read html emails. MS outlook doesn't need a web browser to run, because it uses ... MS Word to render emails, which if you've ever tried to send formatted emails programmatically you'll know it&#x
62.
by migf 4y ago
I wouldn't cold call for this. You've got such a niche product... It's really hard to find applications where this works better than a centralized database. There's so much vapor in that field that it's going to be
63.
by migf 4y ago
Author is ignoring the value of building a network of engineers and professional relationships that will withstand any particular gig. This is the mode we have for building solidarity among developers. Software is unique as a means of produ
64.
by migf 4y ago
"This looks like results I would expect and seems correct" is the exact same level of quality I've encountered when using these systems. It takes someone who already knows what they're doing to parse and QA the results.
65.
by migf 4y ago
I think this is really misguided. While it's true that the stack just enables you build something for people, if you just chase market you have a good chance of piling up technical debt and slowing down before you get there. I have see
66.
by migf 4y ago
This is what I was looking for. It seems weird to always have a jump box sitting up, waiting for someone to come mess with it. Part of the tooling should be to spin up / boot an ephemeral instance.
67.
by migf 4y ago
I am working on building a portfolio of software solutions for business software, IaC, CICD etc that can be used as reference applications. Then, I'm planning to provide those on a fixed fee basis. Sort of like a software accelerator f
68.
by migf 4y ago
This is what struck me as well. The explanation given for the rejection of panpsychism is that it's a non-scientific (unfalsifiable) theory. I think sooner or later you have to confront the fundamental mystery of how it feels to exist,