mickfaraday

9 ms·

1. 31.▲
   What Is a Field in Physics?(demystifyingscience.com)

   2 points by mickfaraday 6y ago|0 comments
2. 32.▲
   Echo of the Big Bang or Echo of the Oceans?(demystifyingscience.com)

   2 points by mickfaraday 6y ago|0 comments
3. 33.▲
   The Externalized Costs of Crewed Space Exploration(demystifyingscience.com)

   1 points by mickfaraday 6y ago|0 comments
4. 34.▲
   Crises require streams of solutions not mere criticism(demystifyingscience.com)

   1 points by mickfaraday 6y ago|1 comments
5. 35.▲
   by mickfaraday 6y ago

   Because charge is rotation in this visualization, we can also say that the charge is moving since the speed of rotation propagates after the circuit is closed. This is a patent reification, of course, but the idea is consistent with QM.
6. 36.▲
   by mickfaraday 6y ago

   yep. I think i agree.
7. 37.▲
   by mickfaraday 6y ago

   photons are transactions between atoms.
8. 38.▲
   by mickfaraday 6y ago

   Density distribution can be transformed to position with spherical shell slice processing from what i understand. This visualization is an interpretation of all of the math we could get our hands on. Hopefully we get closer to what the ato
9. 39.▲
   by mickfaraday 6y ago

   thank you!!! Yes, I'll include a side-by-side when i revisit this for magnetism/solenoid in the next vid.
10. 40.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Not gonna dignify your ad-homs..but aren't u the troll here? Last meal for you: the model is perfectly compatible with all of maxwell's equations and basic QED. This is an illustration not a new theory. Yes, ionization is inter
11. 41.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Same idea but momentum is angular in our model. Like the gearbox of a car.
12. 42.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    aha i get your point exactly. Yes, i'll see if i can't address those for future vids. Unfortunately youtube doesn't let you update vids so i'll have to include those points in the next vid on magnetism. thank you!
13. 43.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Faraday believed his 'fields' were what some sort of actual objects were doing. He called them tentacles IIRC. In our initial atom at beginning of the vid, the electron has tentacles based on Faraday to account for the tails of t
14. 44.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Hydrogen is a great place to start with electricity since there is only one orbital surface/ electron-shell. The principles are easily generalized to the multipolar surfaces of metals. Metals are conductive because of these unique d
15. 45.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Thanks. There is no reason why high-school or younger children can't understand the basic modern conception of the atom. We hope to bring that down to everyone's level. Physics should start with objects. So we start electricity
16. 46.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    It is well understood that the bosons are excitations of fields. A boson is not a 'thing' it is a happening. The atom is the first object in physics. That is a shapely thing with location.
17. 47.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    We can do A/c with the shells rotating back and forth. The micrometer gap is not a problem for the surface of the atom, which can extend indefinitely. The electron is simply an excitation of the electric field in QM, so one does not c
18. 48.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    For us, A/C is simply back and forth motion of the e-shells.
19. 49.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Thanks for commenting. The primary problem with the other analogies is that they don't use real objects. Physics is the science that studies objects that exist, after all. That means we can't be crashing concepts into one anothe
20. 50.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Thank you. We want to make science beautiful and full of possibility.
21. 51.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    thanks. love!
22. 52.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Thanks for your comment. Yes, this model hopefully incorporates more of 'what is real' than the alternatives. The hydrogen orbital, for example, is approximately spherical/toroidal, which matches the radial distribution plot
23. 53.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    "what does this help me grasp" That electricity can be explained with atoms! And not the kind of bohr-model atoms that are thoroughly debunked (electron bead flying around nucleus magically). If we treat them like gearing shells
24. 54.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    You have to view each terminal on its own terms: when viewed from above, each rotating atom at the end of each terminal is rotating oppositely (-/+ charge)...this means when you bring them together they coincide.
25. 55.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    thanks!!
26. 56.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Charge is symbolized by directional momentum of rotation here. Transmission of momentum indicates arc'ing of current.
27. 57.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    You have to really look at the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. Position cannot be sharply determined if we know direction (angular momentum). Speed is problematic too. The state of an electron (or electrons) in the atoms isn't an eig
28. 58.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    it is impossible to deconvolve speed/direction in terms of momentum of the electron, so we simplified the idea with rotation speed. Ideally, the high charge atoms would be more cohesive as well as faster.
29. 59.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    imagine your car's gear box when you put the thing into drive.
30. 60.▲
    by mickfaraday 6y ago

    Thanks. Yes I think those are great questions that the model (shell-shell contact momentum transfer) can address. All aspects of the existing mathematical description can be built into the shell-contact model but will require serious upda