Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
micimize
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
micimize
5y ago
Food quantity and timing, saunas, and caffeine regulation. 1. I find the quantity and timing of food is a big deal. Meals that are too large (especially carb-wise) can really mess with my energy levels, especially if its breakfast. This can
62.
▲
by
micimize
5y ago
Wait but what happened? Did he do something about it after, like contact Sun saying "Stop! You have violated the law!" or whatever? If not, why on earth not? What's the point of publishing with a copyleft license if you aren&
63.
▲
by
micimize
5y ago
"We are NOT developing rapamycin or metformin for dog aging. None of our drugs in development are a classic longevity drug that you will have heard of. Most have never been previously described as aging drugs." – https:/
64.
▲
by
micimize
5y ago
Few things: 1 file != sloppy code. remoteok.io, like nomadslist, is fundamentally much more about marketing and network effects than the software. While that in and of itself is a lesson, sometimes a worthwhile idea is more complicated than
65.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
> In his first post, Mr. Siskind shared his full name. Absolutely incredible way to end this article, as if him "sharing" his full name had nothing to do with the whole fiasco: > I wanted to protect my privacy, but I ended u
66.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
I'm not sure about postgrest, but with postgraphile you can control field exposure and add getters/setters fairly granularly. Regardless, that's no reason to say it's "not a good idea at all." having a schema c
67.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
It's like pedagogical fantasy, or like, narrative programming instead of literate programming. In Neal Stephenson's Anathem there are monks that turn mathematical proofs into songs and other art, and it reminds me of that.
68.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
I love aphyr's posts so much. Aside from just being super entertaining, they have a significant degree of pedagogical value. If one sets out to fathom these incantations, they will end up studying a large swath of under-appreciated lan
69.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
This reminds me of a gtypist wrapper I made early in my career for typing over random quotes from custom sources like the dhammapada or the dao de jing: https://github.com/micimize/type-quotes I would warm up with a fe
70.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
That's just been my experience – I remember having much more pains trying to get AWS IAMs and permissions to work, and I really like that they give you suggestions like "this machine could be smaller" or "this role never
71.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
There are other tradeoffs between cloud providers that are important to keep in mind here. In my experience, GCP has been easier to get started with, and has offerings that are by-and-large more comprehensible. One thing I really appreciate
72.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
For a functionalist, this and every other "more general AI might need X also" is expected. Like, humans need sleep, pain, anxiety, social mediation, etc to achieve our high level of generality. IMO, our base case should be that a
73.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
I find Zulip really promising, but lack of topic archival has always been troubling to me: https://github.com/zulip/zulip/issues/11154 Aside from that, I think it's biggest potential killer feature is ti
74.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
sponsorship != donation. That's why github chose the former. Part of the copy in the sponsor dashboard is even: > You can set sponsor tiers with different prices and rewards
75.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
This is my understanding of what a G2-Item Anti-dependecy Cycle is from the linked paper example: -- Given (roughly) the following transactions: -- Transaction 1 (SELECT, T1) with all_employees as ( select sum(salary) as sala
76.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
Hard forking a project to make use of the hard work the maintainers put in to it, then writing a post doing nothing but insulting those maintainer's decisions / preferences, is not a good look. Neither is throwing temper tantrums
77.
▲
by
micimize
6y ago
I'm a big user of graphile - they've also got a pretty good starter boilerplate with auth, etc baked in: https://github.com/graphile/starter Have you tried it / do you have comparison points? I only poke
78.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
I actually prototyped something similar a long time ago. It allowed for authoring sections that could be composed into a number of views. The only difference is that I wanted to capture the different "facets" of an article as well
79.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
I did my first graphql/flutter/dart development live coding session today: https://youtu.be/TnTOksZ3lUs My intent is to stream development of both the libraries I develop/contribute to (graphql_flutter, built
80.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
All of this doesn't undermine the fundamentals of the model I'm approaching the problem of online voting with. What is the potential upside, and is a system that reaps those benefits without compromising on security possible? I be
81.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
But we've developed processes that allow us to have a functional online banking system. Similar processes might be possible for voting - such as a confirmation and triage period like with ACH transactions, but a month long or something
82.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
Hmm, I hadn't fully grokked the facet of the problem domain. I guess you could give users a spoofing mode, that allowed them to fake any ballot / action. Or possibly, if there was a window of time in which they could change their
83.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
I understand that current solutions to electronic voting are unsatisfactory, but I am fairly baffled by: > It remains unclear if any electronic-only mobile or Internet voting system can practically overcome the stringent security require
84.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
To me the major takeaways from the popularity of this post/discussion: * Modern productivity software is still severely inadequate * No matter how good your system is, the affordance to drop into plain text is key for the dev market
85.
▲
What Makes a Good Readme?
(quora.com)
1 points
by
micimize
7y ago
|
0 comments
86.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
That would be a problem, but would be a data licensing issue, which is distinct. It's more analogous to "Blurred Lines" infringing on "Got To Give It Up" or w/e.
87.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
The creator of the AI still needs to eat. Your suggesting that AI developers should effectively have none of the existing legal protections for software and other creative works. Also, the "bargain" clearly applies to AI applicati
88.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
Hmm, yeah I can see the argument there. I guess it boils down to whether one believes in a transitive property of creativity. I think it applies until the B in "A -creates-> B -creates-> C" is deemed to have certain rights,
89.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
Why wouldn't this be the case? In what sane legal system would one not own the work they published just because it was generated in part or full by an AI? If company B lifts company A's AI and starts generating articles with it, t
90.
▲
by
micimize
7y ago
fossil is a really interesting project, but the switching cost from git is pretty massive. The two killer issues for me: * community/history: any issue I have with git, someone else probably has had. Being a pioneer is very expensive,
More ›