Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
michaelaiello
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks - we must have done something wrong with apache - number of concurrent users we are having right now isn't something we've tested before...
32.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks - hadn't encountered the virtual-hosts issue before, help us out with the link that caused it?
33.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Not sure why the FAQs didn't load for you =/ http://www.identity.io/faqs/ This one (is a start) to answer your Q Who's behind Identity.io? Identity.io is by run by computer security and privacy experts who are serious about putting you in
34.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Yep - wonder if sites would try it, however. The credibility stamps most sites display are verisign + some hacker safe stamp + TRUSTe (a privacy seal). Do you think owners would show a "easy and transparent privacy" stamp?
35.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks for this. We are likely saying you have a BoA account because of an email which they sent you. Showing "how we know" is a good suggestion but would involve us storing some info from your email (which I imagine people who care about p
36.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
I’ve been concerned about privacy online for a while. There is an implicit trade that occurs on most “free” internet sites, your private information in exchange for some service – and it is not in the best interest of the sites to be transp
37.
▲
ShowHN: Identity.io, Opt-out of data brokers and regain control of your privacy
(identity.io)
38 points
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
|
22 comments
38.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Glad we got it right. The site should be much faster now thanks to some tips folks have given here.. and turning off excessive debugging info.
39.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
That is a good point. Perhaps the way we've worded it is giving an incorrect impression. It's tough, most policies look something like this In the event that XXXXXXX is involved in a bankruptcy, merger, acquisition, reorganization or sale o
40.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks for the heads up. We've got an issue with our crawler when it comes to subdomains. Working on it...
41.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
1. Seems we got a lot of feedback and requests for an extension. Sounds like a good idea to me too! 2. Yes a demo video explaining why this is important would be helpful to folks 3. Not sure how to address this. The tool reads and classifie
42.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks - had an old version of the scan in from when we weren't correcting for the www.
43.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
If it's wrong, help train the parrot =) http://www.privacyparrot.com/feedback/correction?site=http%3...
44.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks, code is on a linode. Will be upgrading it to a larger version and doing some apache configs after we drop off the front page....
45.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Yeah this is a very good suggestion. We'll get a TOS up there so we don't get into hot water.
46.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Cool, wonder if we can get some training data for "out of the ordinary" and screen for companies that are big frauds and then short them (like http://www.muddywatersresearch.com/ does)
47.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
We do plan to note changes in the policies. Considered a feature that lets you subscribe to the policies you are interested in and get notices if they change, or if in the news, it is mentioned that the site loses your data. What do you thi
48.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
We deliberated on the categories to include here and went with what we thought made the most sense and was the most clear in policies. A lot of policies don't make the distinction you describe =/
49.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
indeed! we need to fix the subdomain issue
50.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks - had an old version of the scan in from when we weren't correcting for the www.
51.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks for the heads up and the tip, we are getting way more traffic than expected here...
52.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Works just like spam filtering: We're using a naive Bayesian classifier with training data. Built and tested a custom extractor that makes the most sense for the legalese of privacy policies. Ideas: email me at michaelaiello (at) michaelaie
53.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks for pointing that out, we've updated it to say "never share any personal information about you." We've trained the analyzer to mentions of sharing PII with 3rd parties to point out sites that sell data.
54.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Browser plugin was our initial plan, but wanted to get something out there for folks to test and give feedback on without having to install something.
55.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
So far we are looking at 14% can sell data 66% do not sell data 20% sell only when they go bankrupt or get acquired We view people trying to beat the system as a way to improve it.
56.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Thanks, and yes indeed, that's what we are hoping to get towards. We started out with a few other categories & classifiers (i.e. does the site claim intellectual property over what you post ) but wanted to start with "does this site sel
57.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
I've been a member @ HN for quite a while, but I usually just tend to focus in on security and privacy topics. One of my good friends is visiting, and we wanted to work on something challenging together. Both of us find privacy policies ove
58.
▲
Show HN: AI tool reads privacy policies, tells you which sites sell your info.
(privacyparrot.com)
145 points
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
|
71 comments
59.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
The questionnaire to "to assess your suitability for a role" as an "IT Security Exploitation Officer" is actually pretty good. https://www.mi5.gov.uk/careers/it-security-test-your-knowled... You enter the following string into an applicat
60.
▲
by
michaelaiello
15y ago
Hello. I run http://www.lifeensured.com feel free to email me michael.aiello@lifeensured.com. Best, Mike
More ›