mic47

13 ms·

91.
by mic47 8y ago
Why? When Facebook is down, you cannot use Facebook to communicate about the issue. That is also reason why FB still uses* irc instead of messenger for coordinating how to resolve such issues. * Or at least used 1 year ago, when I was worki
92.
by mic47 8y ago
Assuming you've got cell coverage (or cheap roaming).
93.
by mic47 8y ago
> "Should we spend the first 36.8% of our adult lives dating casually, and then settle down with the first person we find who’s better than anyone we’ve dated so far? That would suggest men start seriously looking for a life partner
94.
by mic47 8y ago
This is more of an old web, and because of bad design: keeping state of the app on server, rather than in the browser (or are you referring to limiting open in new tab?). But yes, I hate the new web too (sometimes).
95.
by mic47 8y ago
Tab in browser provides way better user experience than electron app (or native android/ios app). With website you can to mind-blowing things like: * Open other part of your app in new tab. * Open other part of your app in new widow, a
96.
by mic47 8y ago
> Maybe they are just obvious from the outside looking in when you know how the black hats operate these endeavors. Or, they are just obvious from the outside when you haven't actually tried to solve that problem, but that solution
97.
by mic47 8y ago
Are there somewhere accessible documents where Facebook is allegedly in favor of upload filters, or that they actually lobbied for it? Because only what I see in the article (and some linked articles) is that Facebook admitted that they use
98.
by mic47 8y ago
> On the flip side, I'm not sure how important choking it off completely really is to facebook, why get rid of ad revenue if you can pretend to chase the bad guys and keep everyone happy? It's pretty important. In short, there
99.
by mic47 8y ago
No, it's more like a patch. In branch, you drag with you all the dependent changes, while with patch, you have only the actual change, and information which CL -- or PR in github terms -- is dependent. With branches, if someone updates
100.
by mic47 8y ago
> Just speculating, but they might just need this information to combat bots actually. That would be actually quite useful for fighting bots, but I doubt that is the reason. My guess would be just gathering telemetry to how how API is u
101.
by mic47 8y ago
If you are stealing the parcels, you gotta have to do it casually, or you'll look suspicious.
102.
by mic47 8y ago
"why Facebook chose to share the wrong metrics" Why did you choose to include that bug into your code? Srsly, people don't choose to make mistakes (but sometimes they choose to do cover up). Also, there is no such things as &
103.
by mic47 8y ago
If it works well as phone, then it will be great. When I do phone call, when someone pick up, I introduce myself and start talking. When I do hangout meeting, everybody first asks "Can you hear me"?
104.
by mic47 8y ago
Or the FB's own thing is not ready yet. You might get software update to add FB's assistant if/when they do it. Or, voice assistant is not the market FB want to compete on.
105.
by mic47 8y ago
This is best workflow I've used so far (but usually I had separate branch for really unrelated changes).
106.
by mic47 8y ago
difference is that if they keep something from my suitcase, I will know. I have no such guarantees when they access my phone unless I see what they are doing. That means, that you should expect your device and all access tokens on that devi
107.
by mic47 8y ago
No. You own your data stored at Facebook. Facebook just have license to use "as they wish" while respecting your privacy settings (i.e. uploading facebook.tax.xz is definitely not according to privacy settings of most people). At
108.
by mic47 8y ago
Aaaand it's back (just tried to share it and it worked).
109.
by mic47 8y ago
Mayve it has some complicated privacy rules?
110.
by mic47 8y ago
Because ot was not network breach (i.e. get dump from some db), but abuse of feature available in the web app (so they had good logs to see who was affected).
111.
by mic47 8y ago
Could this be only when you are logged-in to your account in chrome? I.e. "if you are logged-in to chrome, it won't delete google cookies because it need it for you to be logged-in to chrome (because of some UX excuse, like user c
112.
by mic47 8y ago
> That's great, but then it says that in order to improve you need to declare a metric so you have something to measure, and then work to improve that. You don't have to keep the metric same. Metrics are good when they helps yo
113.
by mic47 8y ago
I would prefer to use editor as yiu describe. but realitybis that jupyter is something lot of people like, find awesone and want to use. this is something that helps someone like me use what other use, but feel less pain. maybe people on fu
114.
by mic47 8y ago
1 thing. Code review. Even thou notebooks are not meant for production code, it's good to check them into repository to document what you did (let's ignore out of order computation and other horrors), and get feedback on your code
115.
by mic47 8y ago
> "Significant numbers of people are expressing a sentiment through their alleged abuse of the feature, and instead of trying to channel that constructively, the company is devising ways to ignore it." What's the character
116.
by mic47 8y ago
> Really it's more "how likely is this person to accurately flag an article that matches Facebook's internal definition of fake news." Couldn't say it better.
117.
by mic47 8y ago
According to article it looks like it's about marking something as fake news (i.e. how "correct" you are in that). At least that is how I understood it.
118.
by mic47 8y ago
I worked for FB anti-spam team, and believe me, nobody trusted user feedback absolutely (i.e. it's good to send to review, but not automatically take down). I guess that with fake news the signal to noise ratio is even worse. The whole
119.
by mic47 8y ago
For Haskell -> JVM, there is Frege/Eta compiler. You could argue those are dialects of Haskell, but are pretty close. The differences will be around FFI because of jvm
120.
by mic47 8y ago
So, you can apparently compile C++ to LLVM-IR, then to Javascript, then to Python and then to C++ (you can do similar feat with C). Wonder if there is a fix point, or it diverges.

More ›