mic47

17 ms·

31.
by mic47 7y ago
Bug bounty programs are not supposed to replace you other security activities, but it's a way for you to have additional source of vulnerabilities. Advantages of these programs is that security researcher will get rewarded when they fi
32.
by mic47 7y ago
Depends on whether you breath in and breath into the pipe (which is not ok), or just breath in from the pipe, and breath out elsewhere (you will need some valve that will regulate the flow here).
33.
by mic47 7y ago
> To me, this implies a further disadvantage: extremely high latency when compared with in-person collaboration. First, it's high latency, not extremely high latency. Second, it has huge advantages: 1.) While latency (in terms of h
34.
by mic47 7y ago
I think that the 20% comes from the percentage of serious cases (It was 20% in past, now it's 12% https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ ). Problem with serious cases are that they need medical attention, so i
35.
by mic47 7y ago
If you want to have just persistent histry (really simple), you can use vanilla bash history something like. export HISTCONTROL=ignorespace shopt -s histappend export HISTSIZE=99999999 # Big enough number to never rotate history (or when
36.
by mic47 7y ago
Sure, it's all here in my rc files repo, though scattered in this repo https://github.com/mic47/linux-configuration Here are pointers: This install fzf into your bash, and apply small patch on fzf scripts to use b
37.
by mic47 7y ago
This is cool, I'll definitely add this to my workflow. What I do is that I have custom bash history (with no limit on how many item there can be), that stores also an active directory, and id of the shell session. Then when I hit ctrl-
38.
by mic47 7y ago
I read it more like this: If you are building right thing, but you are not aligned, then you will not build the right thing and you will fail. But if you are aligned, it's easier to steer the ship closer to the right thing.
39.
by mic47 7y ago
Legal: It will be hard to argue in court that you have right to create fake accounts. That is definitely against TOS, and at that point Linkedin can sue the company instead, so I believe it would scraper would not be successful at court. Te
40.
by mic47 7y ago
I strongly disagree that not allowing scraping protection on social network is a good thing (reasons mostly from this thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22182144 ) What I would do on Linkedin side is: 1. Split publ
41.
by mic47 7y ago
Agree with this, and I would also add this - I want to be in control of my data and change the setting. - I want to be able to delete my data. If scraping on linked-in is banned (and linked-in is enforcing it), then I do have have control
42.
by mic47 7y ago
There are couple of implementarion of strings: * String - this is default, it is list of characters and it was a mistake. * ByteString and LazyByteString - this represents array of 8bit characters. Performant but does not handle encodings
43.
by mic47 7y ago
The actual policy is not to fact check political ads, but they will still take down "ads that encouraged violence or seek to suppress voting." (after quick googling I found this, there are probably better sources: https:/&#x
44.
by mic47 7y ago
"Oh you want to to serve ads to individuals that shop at Uniqlo? Here's a list of profiles to target that have checked into a Uniqlo three times in the past 6 weeks" No, this is not true. It's more like "Oh you want
45.
by mic47 7y ago
Yes, because air travel have less trips but quite longer. Title is as fair as me saying that space shuttle is safer than walking per billion km.
46.
by mic47 7y ago
well, VP of Abuse is exactly as good as VP of Spam. You know, it's not clear, whether you are trying to to reduce abuse/spam, or create it.
47.
by mic47 7y ago
Ever heard about 0days?
48.
by mic47 7y ago
Integrity teams at FB are teams that handle abuse on the platform, and other bad things (fake accounts, spam, malicious developers, malicious ads, ...). Why integrity? Bunch of teams (not all) that did abuse had integrity in their name (lik
49.
by mic47 7y ago
To me, the date in the blog is indication how relevant it is. So if you updated links and info in 2y blog to make it relevant again, I don't mind if the date would be today. But probably best would be to put 2 dates: original publish d
50.
by mic47 7y ago
This might be actually a good thing. Say that you are a user, which uploads a LOT of large videos that almost nobody is watching, apart from your small cabal, and you restrict ads on them (AFAIK was possible in past, not sure if it is now).
51.
by mic47 7y ago
Or it's just another example of ridiculous journalists expectations: they make inquiry during weekend / Friday evening and expect you to respond immediately. But you know, even people at Ring have lives.... Generally whenever jour
52.
by mic47 7y ago
" Someone who wants to sexually harass a person via Facebook isn’t going to be deterred because they might get reported (and then... presumably nothing?) for sending an emoji." No, but person reviewing such reported content now ha
53.
by mic47 7y ago
I guess this applies to reported content, and maybe for content for wider audience (like public post / group / ...)? I.e. if you send eggplant to your GF via chat, and she does not report you, it's fine. But if she receives p
54.
by mic47 7y ago
Just curious, what was the reason that Haskell developer left? I know 1 company where this happened, but there Haskell developers left because management decided to move to python (without them even knowing its under consideration).
55.
by mic47 7y ago
note that ghci will give you much more comprehensible error message, than tryhaskell.org
56.
by mic47 7y ago
For quick iterations, you have ghci. You just edit your files, type :r and it will recompile only necessary files, which is really quick (and I miss it in most other REPLs). Similar with incremental compilation. But if you need to compile h
57.
by mic47 7y ago
In case you need to add logging, you can always close your eyes and use unsafePerformIO anywhere, since from the view of the application, logging is just write-only side-effect. It's all about how much do you isolate sideeffects from e
58.
by mic47 7y ago
In what situation? If you predict everything correctly, you don't have to, but I was referring that you don't have to have everything designed upfront, since refactor is much easier and safer than in other languages. I wanted to m
59.
by mic47 7y ago
>Architecture is extremely sensitive to the initial choices due to isolation of side effects. Only if you choose to isolate all side effects from each other. Actually Haskell makes refactoring really easy, so you can adapt your implemen
60.
by mic47 7y ago
> We have windows, tiny little cameras that go through walls, and we can ping cell-phones. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't all of those work better than this incredibly convoluted method? This is research. Currently it&#x

More ›