mhuffman

61 ms·

751.
by mhuffman 9y ago
> So it seems the only way to get there is if you somehow get 100M daily viewers then you could have a compelling case to make for licensing. Even then there is friction in the system. Look at some of the enormous distribution platforms
752.
by mhuffman 9y ago
> Honestly, is it that hard to make a legal version of PopcornTime/Solarmovie/Putlocker? Yes! I have some experience in this industry and it is pretty much impossible. Every level of the industry has long-standing practices wit
753.
by mhuffman 9y ago
I think it is ok to express displeasure at the state of something without just silently doing something else and hoping that the entire ecosystem catches up to you. For example, I take every opportunity (like right now, for example) to shit
754.
by mhuffman 9y ago
Time value of money is also based on risk. You are betting that there is an alternative sure thing at which you could earn some expected rate.
755.
by mhuffman 9y ago
I don't know what level you are operating at regarding machine learning or AI, but the fast.ai MOOC is one of the best educational resources in that area I have ever seen in my life. If you have not tried it out yet, I very highly reco
756.
by mhuffman 9y ago
>> and enforcement actions like that are the only reason that people make the loans in the first place. And also that delicious interest. You forget that the lenders already intend on getting something out of it. The reason they are g
757.
by mhuffman 9y ago
It is their definition of "hostile" that is the problem. They do not explain. I suspect it means "I can't track you, so you are hostile." Otherwise, where is the data for this?
758.
by mhuffman 9y ago
DDoS over Tor is absurd.
759.
by mhuffman 9y ago
My link was a direct response to your second link. I do not believe cloudflare on your first link (that they treat tor ips like any ips). I can tell you from experience that I have never connected to a cloudflare backed site with tor that d
760.
by mhuffman 9y ago
> The things that makes TOR useful for people avoiding prosecution also makes it useful for people involved in malicious and criminal activities ... Everything from spam and network attacks to trafficking people and contraband. It is ok
761.
by mhuffman 10y ago
This is the correct answer to OP's article title. Any social network that looks viable will be killed in its cradle* or integrated into one of the big boys. * of course I mean acquired
762.
by mhuffman 10y ago
Why not make it patent free for government and charity funded projects then?
763.
by mhuffman 10y ago
Very much so! [1] You can even see on the chart how there was very little until inauguration, giant leaps after unpopular EO's, and you can even see the portfolio drop when Trump took a beat and eased up on the EOs after Feb 3rd. [1]
764.
by mhuffman 10y ago
I have been doing the opposite. Whenever Trump signs on executive order or signals an intention, I presume it will either fail or will end in bad results for the poor and middle class. Then, working as if that were true, I see if there are
765.
by mhuffman 10y ago
> with respect to that agency ... and there is the "out". Just engage in lobbying activities with respect to another agency, where you now have a lot of contacts. Or consult with an agency that does engage in lobbying activitie
766.
by mhuffman 10y ago
Not directly related to your question, but I suspect pigz and gnu parallel would dramatically speed up your current command-line technique, if you are on a multi-processor machine. Also you might put export LC_ALL=C before fgrep, since you
767.
by mhuffman 10y ago
Opioids are worth lots on the street. Even people with "real pain" still need money right? Especially in a state like WV. So if you can get enough pills to cover your own pain management (meaning you likely can't work anyway)
768.
by mhuffman 10y ago
Well, there is also information asymmetry at play here. Patients could have legit pain, and then go to multiple doctors, without the others finding out. Then they could sell those to other people, or use them all themselves. On the other ha
769.
by mhuffman 10y ago
Siraj, Ima go ahead and say that your videos have a bit of cognitive friction. You and your personality are fine, but the jump between the intro and the payoff is jarring. You need to hold our hand a little more ... jus' sayin'.
770.
by mhuffman 10y ago
Just tested with some notebooks that tax my server and it was very responsive! Well done!
771.
by mhuffman 10y ago
I have found node and tornado to have practically identical performance. I have not had a lot of experience with GO and Elixir for web servers. nginx (openresty, really) has beat both of them them in all "normal" (ie. not limited
772.
by mhuffman 10y ago
> I am literally just confused Yes you are. You have completely confused everything I have written, even though I thought it was in plain English. > Do you think women are being given jobs that should have gone to men in a fair world
773.
by mhuffman 10y ago
> You were suggesting in the top comment that women are being given jobs because they are women I did not. However, since you bring it up, women statistically can not move up the ranks faster than men, right? There are about 50/50 m
774.
by mhuffman 10y ago
> So your comment says that women are currently being promoted due to skill? That statistically can not be the case, right? There are about 50/50 men women in the country. They are the same in every way but genitals. So about half o
775.
by mhuffman 10y ago
How about this distinction? If favoritism (or some sort of -ism) is/was responsible for all of men's achievements or stations -- isn't the converse true? Doesn't that mean that if women rise through the ranks faster than
776.
by mhuffman 10y ago
Wow! Did you even read my comment? I was saying that opposite of that!
777.
by mhuffman 10y ago
As a man, I am embarrassed that you can't see the point he was making. It's not that "Wimmin' are takin' our jerbs!", he was just pointing out that promoting women because they have a vagina is just as bad as p
778.
by mhuffman 10y ago
> They just have to trim down to a profitable and stable level, and accept that they're post-growth. A phrase that sends shudders through stockholders! It is amazing that companies seem to think that there is infinite growth potenti
779.
by mhuffman 10y ago
As might judgement by a third party ...
780.
by mhuffman 10y ago
I strongly disagree. I think it is more imbalanced. Police officers have life and death power of everyone they meet.

More ›