Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mhoad
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
151.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
I hope Santa got you a dictionary for Christmas because you seem to be using a lot of words there a lot more confidently than you should be.
152.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
What are you even talking about…
153.
▲
Musk Lifted Bans for Thousands on Twitter. Here’s What They’re Tweeting
(nytimes.com)
7 points
by
mhoad
4y ago
|
0 comments
154.
▲
Apple accused of censoring apps in Hong Kong and Russia to keep market access
(theregister.com)
9 points
by
mhoad
4y ago
|
2 comments
155.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
I’m not actually in the Rust ecosystem at all and only just discovered the domain belongs to the official Rust project. That clearly changes the trust calculation in this scenario. I had assumed it was some 3rd party project which would hav
156.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
I get what you are trying to say here but I could also make the argument that you actually doubled it because now you have to trust two things rather than one. Depending on how you want to consider trust in a wider sense too it may even be
157.
▲
#TwitterFiles is becoming a conspiracy theory
(hellscape.substack.com)
10 points
by
mhoad
4y ago
|
2 comments
158.
▲
Police say member of Elon Musk's security team is a suspect in stalker case
(nbcnews.com)
20 points
by
mhoad
4y ago
|
0 comments
159.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
I feel like maybe you’re responding to an argument I’m not actually making. I don’t disagree with anything you just said in that post.
160.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
I’ve yet to see a single consistent principle from them to be fair. Reactionary is kind of their defining feature. I was more talking about the outcomes that tend to follow them around.
161.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
I don’t know.. probably more into school shootings and racism than usual? I didn’t pick the term, I was replying to a comment that used it. I was just trying to keep it consistent.
162.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
Right. It’s been long known that it only works for a tiny fraction of products that meet a very specific criteria. It’s unprofitable for everyone else which is why most companies are totally ok walking away already. It’s also typically used
163.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
I promise you this isn’t a “let’s wait and see” situation. Nobody is going to be splashing out the kind of money needed to buy a Tesla as a car they up until this point they hated at a conceptual level to “own the libs”. These are some of t
164.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
It’s not a strawman. I’m talking about very concrete facts. 1. There is not a single instance in the entire history of the internet of a profitable alt right social media website that anyone actually uses. 2. The price he paid was indeed so
165.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
That theory fundamentally misunderstands Trumpist mentality which in no way is going to start buying electric cars because they see it as an affront to their fragile sense of masculinity.
166.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
They aren’t coming back. I’m going to assume marketing and advertising are not your background but they are mine. I need you to understand that even before Elon, brands were already extremely on the fence about allocating budget towards Twi
167.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
Maybe “revenue” is masking the reality of the situation here. No alt right echo chamber is ever in a million years going to be able to provide a good return on investment for $44B. If they go down that path they WILL die which was my origin
168.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
I did say social media companies for the record which is what we are actually talking about here.
169.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
It’s a matter of historical record that there are no profitable or successful social media companies that could be described as alt-right echo chambers. The only brands that want to advertise on those sites are scams.
170.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
Tesla is potentially in meaningful trouble at this point. Basically the entire market of everyone who realistically might consider an electric vehicle in the next five years overwhelmingly wants nothing to do with him moving forward. Sounds
171.
▲
Why Petulant Oligarchs Rule Our World
(nytimes.com)
2 points
by
mhoad
4y ago
|
0 comments
172.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
This line you keep telling yourself about it being too early to tell is because you don’t seem to have any kind of business or advertising background. It is obvious and has been for weeks now to those who do. I assure you these are going to
173.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
You just described the same thing twice.
174.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
This is wishful thinking. The business is fundamentally broken beyond repair at this point. They lost the majority of their only meaningful income source. They managed to scare off a large number of their most valuable content creators. The
175.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
Just cared enough to take time out of your day to offer your opinion on the topic that nobody asked for.
176.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
JFC this is an embarrassing reply.
177.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
You seem to have some incredibly strong opinions on how you think national security is supposed to work while not seeming to understand even the basic functionality of the role and remit of the FBI. It’s ok to just say you don’t know someti
178.
▲
Apple 'created decoy labor group' to derail unionization
(theregister.com)
2 points
by
mhoad
4y ago
|
0 comments
179.
▲
by
mhoad
4y ago
What makes you think he is capable of stopping the shenanigans? Surely for so time now everyone around him who might have had his actual interests in mind has begged him repeatedly to stop making such a mess.
180.
▲
Tesla Stock Plunges to Two-Year Low After Musk Bans Journalists from Twitter
(rollingstone.com)
13 points
by
mhoad
4y ago
|
8 comments
More ›