mhluongo

70 ms·

811.
Neo4j 1.7 Released(blog.neo4j.org)
44 points by mhluongo 15y ago|23 comments
812.
Client-Side Gremlin "Libraries" in Neo4j(mattluongo.com)
2 points by mhluongo 15y ago|0 comments
813.
Why another search engine?(mattluongo.com)
3 points by mhluongo 15y ago|0 comments
814.
by mhluongo 15y ago
Bulbflow does look pretty sweet, but from what I've seen solves the data lookup problem a little differently. I love that it's built on Rexter and aims to work across graph dbs. I've kept actively developing neo4django because we need reall
815.
Design preview for upcoming search engine - love feedback(blog.scholr.ly)
1 points by mhluongo 15y ago|0 comments
816.
Neo4django 0.1.5 release(mattluongo.com)
5 points by mhluongo 15y ago|3 comments
817.
Status Update - Academic Search for the Holidays (blog.scholr.ly)
1 points by mhluongo 15y ago|0 comments
818.
Neo4django - a Neo4j/Django integration layer(github.com)
1 points by mhluongo 15y ago|0 comments
819.
Neo4django - a Neo4j/Django integration layer(mattluongo.com)
2 points by mhluongo 15y ago|0 comments
820.
Help Needed - What Engineers Think of Developers(cc.gatech.edu)
5 points by mhluongo 15y ago|2 comments
821.
Moving to Django (from Drupal)(mattluongo.com)
2 points by mhluongo 15y ago|0 comments
822.
Going All In(mattluongo.com)
1 points by mhluongo 15y ago|0 comments
823.
by mhluongo 16y ago
What else needs to be done to improve GS?
824.
Improving on Google Scholar(blog.scholr.ly)
2 points by mhluongo 16y ago|1 comments
825.
by mhluongo 16y ago
Just made my day, ty =)
826.
Tokyo Cabinet - Comparison Functions(mattluongo.com)
2 points by mhluongo 16y ago|3 comments
827.
by mhluongo 16y ago
Do you think confusing that with a user's actual CV would be an issue?
828.
by mhluongo 16y ago
Added a bit about our audience and structure. I'd like to come up with something unique- I thought vita was good, given the academic feel, but on second thought it might be stilted.
829.
Ask HN: A better word for profile?
7 points by mhluongo 16y ago|5 comments
830.
by mhluongo 16y ago
KeePassX is a very popular cross-platform password manager. I think the Dropbox solution (from micheljansen) is pretty common.
831.
by mhluongo 16y ago
Hm. There needs to be some sort of throttling on the channel- if you open a console and run "while(true){ $.post('/shove/updatepos', { 'x':50000, 'y':50000 }); }" you can really ruin people's good
832.
by mhluongo 16y ago
I heard a story the other day about a paper trying to make it into CHI, a big conference in human-computer interaction. In CS and its subfields, conferences like CHI tend to be more important than journals (or so I've heard). Anyway, the pa
833.
by mhluongo 16y ago
The problem is that arxiv-style publishing cannot replace peer-reviewed work in academia. Peer review isn't just something the big publishers are pushing- it's an integral part of academia. Without reputation, a journal doesn't get read-
834.
by mhluongo 16y ago
Removing barriers to increase citation count, h-index, etc is the primary argument for open access from an author's perspective. I went to a talk at Georgia Tech on open access recently, put on by the library, and they harped really hard on
835.
by mhluongo 16y ago
You've got some great ideas, but some of them are stymied by academic ego. For example, in peer review, reviews are generally unnamed. A discussion thread based system can suffer from what peer review did - people refuse to comment negative
836.
by mhluongo 16y ago
For the products of funding by NIH, see PubMed - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
837.
by mhluongo 16y ago
But their main purpose is no longer "to make money".
838.
by mhluongo 16y ago
If an open-access journal can become reputable enough, the niche in a field interested in the journal will publish there- period. It doesn't require laws to be passed.
839.
by mhluongo 16y ago
My understanding is that the problem with making scientific journals freely available is usually one of reputation. Reputable journals need strong peer review and editing, which isn't always free. Further, until a journal is reputable, few
840.
by mhluongo 16y ago
Instead of advertising, many make up for their costs through endowments and charging an author to publish.

More ›