mhluongo

32 ms·

331.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Just before the first futures it was surging and they went down. But anecdotally it does seem to happen more on the ride down
332.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Jaxx is a very low security wallet, and this has nothing to do with storage- it's watch-only like Blockfolio.
333.
by mhluongo 9y ago
*booming
334.
by mhluongo 9y ago
A coin "booking" doesn't imply technical strength- that's the problem here.
335.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Can confirm first hand this is a serious issue in the industry. There are finally a couple crypto-friendly banks making it easier for holders and businesses. Source- have run a BTC co since 2014.
336.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Not quite. You have to trust that they aren't colluding . It's fine if they're malicious as long as they aren't aligned
337.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Fold | San Mateo, CA | Software Engineer | ONSITE & REMOTE Fold is a cryptocurrency payments company backed by a number of well-known investors in the space. We have exciting new opportunities with Keep ( https://keep.network
338.
by mhluongo 9y ago
That's not by definition at all- a work can be open source with a "proprietary license of some sort", or closed source, with source that's liberally licensed- but never published.
339.
by mhluongo 9y ago
You want an investigation on how the funds got frozen?
340.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Google Cloud does reserve instances automatically...
341.
by mhluongo 9y ago
It's just an incentive and control plane for other stuff. You still need the other stuff.
342.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Trustless, double-spend proof payments. Marketplaces for verifiable third party computation. Fair multiparty computation.
343.
by mhluongo 9y ago
There's a large gray middle, eg adult entertainment, where the service is legal but the payment processors charge ridiculous feeds and are unreliable.
344.
by mhluongo 9y ago
He called it Boober IIRC.
345.
by mhluongo 9y ago
They almost certainly did. Crypto exchanges will give market makers and arb shops deals on exchange rates.
346.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Because the math is freaking cool? :)
347.
by mhluongo 9y ago
All sorts, but those that are easy to convince yourself about are any arithmetic or Boolean circuit.
348.
by mhluongo 9y ago
It's necessary for the network design.
349.
by mhluongo 9y ago
> That's because verifying work is usually almost as difficult as computing. Where did you get that idea? What about zk-proofs, like SNARKs and STARKs? I'm working on a multiparty computation system right now that uses a proof
350.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Agree with the idea re: futures in general, but there are presales for physical goods that most agree aren't a security...
351.
by mhluongo 9y ago
A long term way that doesn't bankrupt you first? I doubt it, but I don't know your financial situation. Plenty of exchanges will offer you shorts if you're that confident, though. BitFinex and Kraken come to mind.
352.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Banned raising money through ICOs for securities . It looks like they're taking a more even-handed approach than the article maintains. The r/ethereum post has link to translated announcements, etc [0]. [0] - https://
353.
by mhluongo 9y ago
What are you having trouble figuring out? Happy to help people into crypto
354.
How to kill Equifax with Ethereum and multiparty computation(medium.com)
3 points by mhluongo 9y ago|0 comments
355.
Mixers and ring signatures(decentralize.today)
1 points by mhluongo 9y ago|0 comments
356.
Private and permissioned ledgers(decentralize.today)
1 points by mhluongo 9y ago|0 comments
357.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Perhaps I should've said "considering the feedback I've gotten from technical and non-technical reviewers". I think my loose narrative could be turned into a proper zk proof with few restrictions- care to give it a try?
358.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Considering feedback I've gotten in less technical forums, I'm happy with it. I've also linked to more rigorous material throughout the post. If you have a minimal example of what you would change or acknowledge to improve th
359.
by mhluongo 9y ago
"Proof" and "zero-knowledge" certainly still have meaning in the situation you've described. If we actually needed to do zk proofs over concepts like that, we'd need defined ontologies and all sorts of logic to
360.
by mhluongo 9y ago
Zk proofs shouldn't leak knowledge to cheating provers or verifiers. Sometimes the verifier has access to a secret, and just needs to confirm the prover does as well. We're stretching what was supposed to be a useful analogy pre

More ›