mgraczyk

7 ms·

61.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
I have, it's the fault of how medicine is practiced to reduce cost. It's completely avoidable, you can just not tell people their scan results if they have no symptoms and the detection is less than 95% likely to be cancer. This i
62.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
I mean that you should stay up to date and practiced on how to get the most out of models. Using harnesses like Claude code sure, but also knowing their strengths and weaknesses so you can learn when and how to delegate and take on more sco
63.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
You'll be behind by a few months at least, and that could be anywhere from slightly harmful to devasting to your career
64.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
Did you read my two options? Do you agree option 2 is better than option 1? If so, then scans are better than no scan You don't need to show that it's possible to avoid false positives. That's doctors being irrational. You on
65.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
I don't think so. That's a good point but the capability has been outpacing people's ability to use it for a while and that will continue. Put another way, the ability to use AI became an important factor in overall software
66.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
Even if you believe that many are too far on one side now, you have to account for the fact that AI will get better rapidly. If you're not using it now you may end up lacking preparation when it becomes more valuable
67.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
Doctors here are cognitively captured by a system designed to limit cost (and that's mostly a good thing) But scanning frequently is overwhelmingly good for the patient. The problem is the doctors. Imagine two possibilities. 1. You sca
68.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
And yes getting frequent full body MRIs is still overwhelming the right thing for the patient.
69.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
This entire chain of reasoning takes for granted that there won't be a singularity If you're talking about "reforming society", you are really not getting it. There won't be society, there won't be earth, there
70.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
The headline seems false, should we change it? It doesn't look like they showed any case where any autonomous car or drone obeyed prompt injections
71.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
But unfortunately it does sometimes work, for example in Yugoslavia. And it would have worked in Iraq if we hadn't dismantled the entire civilian infrastructure.
72.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
We never do anything that reduce model intelligence like that
73.
by mgraczyk 8mo ago
That issue did not have any time of day dependence
74.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
It's neither of those things. The answer is in your quoted sentence. "model training"
75.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
Seems very unlikely considering the current equilibrium is for many services to offer ad-free premium versions, even recently creating these tiers. If anything the trend is moving in the other direction, more services offer paid ad free tie
76.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
The ARPU will likely remain low enough that it's not worth potential churn to competitors
77.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
Do you think this is evidence that it was designed that way, as opposed to the exact opposite? It was not designed that way, so they had to specifically do extra things to make it not that way. This is like saying that python is designed to
78.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
Do you have any evidence that this claim is true? That it was "designed" for this? That would be a pretty difficult conspiracy for them to keep secret
79.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
Over 50% of the German population is overweight, and over 20% is obese I think many Germans will start using these drugs once they become cheaper
80.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
What is the mechanism that you believe would cause this to lower home prices? Early signals are that the announcement alone will increase prices
81.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
Putting aside whether this person is just lying, the actual claim doesn't seem possible if you think about it for more than a few seconds. The claim is that the benefits fee does not go to the driver, but that is not possible in the on
82.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
The incentives are that a lot of the specific claims would be bad for long term retention and would be embarrassing if made public. That doesn't imply it's fake but it's not obvious any company would be incentivized to behave
83.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
I think if you paste our conversation into ChatGPT it can explain the relevant upsampling algorithms. There are algorithms that will artificially enhance edges in a way that can look like "AI", for example everything done on pixel
84.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
> somehow seem to be defending Samsung voraciously but emptily The first words I said were that Samsung probably did this And you're right that I didn't read the dozens of edits which were added after the original post. I was b
85.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
You're mistaken and the original experiment does not distinguish between classic edge aware upscaling/super resolution vs more problematic replacement
86.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
That is not true For example see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_enhancement
87.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
And? What algorithm was used for downsampling? What was the high frequency content of the downsampled imagine after doing a psuedo inverse with upsampling? How closely does it match the Samsung output? My point is that there IS an experimen
88.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
I think Samsung was doing what was alleged, but as somebody who was working on state of the art algorithms for camera processing at a competitor while this was happening, this experiment does not prove what is alleged. Gaussian blurring doe
89.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
Well we don't ban cigarettes But cigarettes are harmful for everyone, social media is not
90.
by mgraczyk 9mo ago
That's wrong and even if it were not wrong, it would still not fix the problem. What if the most likely response is "kill yourself"

More ›