mexicocitinluez

6 ms·

61.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
> So if someone was doing insider trading, and the SEC came knocking, then immediately afterwards they start burning every document they have and microwaving their computers, do you think they should get off the hook? Apples and oranges.
62.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
The other day I asked it to update a handful of files using a new pattern I built. It was tedious work, and probably would have taken me 10 minutes, but I figure why not just let Claude do it. Well, it spun up multiple agents, each taking a
63.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
> the logic being you don't want to do that every time for every prompt That's definitely a downside of a minimal MD and I could def be wasting tokens. I've tried to scope the tasks such that it won't feel the need t
64.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
I shouldn't have been so hyperbolic. I do have some general statements about tone and not to go down follow-up question rabbit holes and when to push back or not to install dotnet while on WSL and just go through Windows. Anything that
65.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
This is definitely controversial, but I think the best CLAUDE.MD is no CLAUDE.MD at all. Every time I found myself wanting to put information into that file, I asked myself "Why isn't this already obvious from the code itself?&quo
66.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
Amen on both your and OP's comments. These tools work pretty well out-of-the-box. I'm sure I could squeeze out better token usage or streamline some tool calls, but it's not something I really want to focus on. Just like I do
67.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
Also, the there are hundreds of ways to use these tools. From semi-intelligent autocomplete to fully agent-driven. Where's the line? What if I had an LLM clean up a fairly long stored procedure? Is that single action now forbidding me
68.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
How do you know it wasn't the appropriate technology? My point is that the idiom has now come to mean "I disagree with your tech choices".
69.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
This has to be one of the more annoying characteristics of the recent models. Every answer is met with "But did you think about X", or "One more thing to consider" and it almost starts to feel manic as you dig down that
70.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
I'm not saying confusion isn't warranted. I was just commenting about how the "to a man with a hammer" idiom has now come to mean "I don't agree with your tech choices".
71.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
> Nobody who worked in the 80s or 90s would have selected this solution How does this support your argument? The tech didn't even exist in the 80s or 90s. Saying "They wouldn't have made the same choices 40 years" is
72.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
This saying has been abused 10 ways til Sunday. "I'm using technology I know that will get us there" is not the same as treating every problem as a nail. It's making a practical choice that probably also had time constra
73.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
> To be fair, that’s 50% the shop’s fault. They could have probably provided access via a link like GDrive allows. But of course, some moron on the other end would probably find it incomprehensible why you don’t already have an MS accoun
74.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
This is a configuration issue. Onedrive also supports OTPs. But regardless, what alternative would you propose? Did it contain any sensitive information? Does the alternative integrate with your current system? Do people need to create acco
75.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
And if they haven't disabled it, clicking "I can't use authenticator" and relying on SMS is always a backup.
76.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
Same. Granted I have the $100/month Claude sub and barely ever see any of my usage bars go above 50% before they're reset (and that's when I had lined up a bunch of things to test Fable with).
77.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
> Musk bought Twitter looking to build an “everything app,” Part of me thinks he knows he lying and is just trying to drum up money and the other part thinks he's one of the most delusional and uninformed people in tech.
78.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
It does as of EF Core 8 or 9. One of the challenges for their team I'm assuming is making sure the release notes also get copied to the actual documentation. This was one case where I thought the same thing and only until reading the r
79.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
What was the request? Also, Claude refuses political stuff in general, not just your specific beliefs.
80.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
> 1. They pretend SQL is standardized, and support a heavily reduced featureset for any given database as a result EF Core is provider-specific and also exposes provider-specific functionality. > 4. You end up not wanting to use the o
81.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
With the big exception of Entity Framework which relies on LINQ.
82.
by mexicocitinluez 3mo ago
> I know only a few ORM's but it seems they end up just adding another layer of DTO objects that are entirely separate from the domain classes anyway. Entity Framework in particular has come a long way in this regard. Particularly o
83.
by mexicocitinluez 4mo ago
So again, you can train people but not AI? That's literally what you've said and now moving the goal posts in a way that makes no difference to what you said being patently wrong. It's wild having to argue with people who say
84.
by mexicocitinluez 4mo ago
> Frankly, I'm sure if people wanted to sneak in an AI generated code by carefully reviewing it and making sure it's targeted and well tested But this is exactly the point I'm making. If the code is carefully reviewed, tar
85.
by mexicocitinluez 4mo ago
Saying you didn't use AI when you did, regardless of the end product, is lying. What definition of the word lie wouldn't cover that?
86.
by mexicocitinluez 4mo ago
A social contract? You invented that out of thin air. They're a means to an end not some discussion on philosophy.
87.
by mexicocitinluez 4mo ago
lol Human beings are famously not already trained.
88.
by mexicocitinluez 4mo ago
So when you said "AI cant be trained" you didn't mean "AI cant be trained" you meant that you personally can't? lol.
89.
by mexicocitinluez 4mo ago
> can be trained to make it good and also improves the community. AI can be trained. Also, AI can create code that improves the community. It's replies like this that leave me even more confused.
90.
by mexicocitinluez 4mo ago
> A pull request is a social artifact whose value and meaning is dependent on its author; Says who? How can you say I'm categorically wrong when your entire point rests upon an opinion?

More ›