mewpmewp2

5 ms·

31.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
Yeah, I think it's more so learning from experiences that didn't scale. E.g. I started out with Notepad, and wrote everything for the website I wanted to build in a single large massive php file. I of course don't do that any
32.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
But the problem was that the report is not saying "not found", it is saying "is not present" or "there is no X". And I think we can easily have examples where we can reasonably trust this, and a spectrum of suc
33.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
This is precisely why I never heat my food and consume caffeine pills instead of coffee.
34.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
> anyone is morally and legally correct I think it's more so similar to that if you leave something shiny and expensive in a visible position in a car in a neighborhood known for high rate of thievery there are good odds of your stu
35.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
What is your relation to those people? Because, what is the use of emotional intelligence if it doesn't help them to see their biases and instead confirms them. If presumably their biases are harmful for their lives? I just see those e
36.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
Wouldn't Bayes and logic lead you to immediately believe that some claims, ideas, and beliefs may be more logically sound or matter more than others, steering you away from indifferentism, but the reason why I thought you might be stuc
37.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
Why did you pretend to agree with them? Would a person with such biases, seeking validation from an LLM having been anything else without an LLM? If everyone in real life are trying to avoid upsetting such person, the humans in their real l
38.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
Is that a reference to the popular meme from youth nowadays?
39.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
I see, that totally makes sense. You got stuck there and there's just no way out.
40.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
And what is the reason for indifferentism as opposed to atheistic agnosticism?
41.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
Do you mean those three things are what let you solve it, or that they're what kept you from solving it more often?
42.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
Would you say you are happy as in you have solved happiness for yourself?
43.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
I think happiness is very complicated. Would you think there's a perfect formula to follow that will yield you the "happiness"? And how does this relate to different brain wirings of different people? Would you say per brain
44.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
And on the other hand talking to people, but I guess most extroverts in a way are "addicted" to talking to people as well, so it's a fair comparison. From my personal experience talking to people can end in wildly differing a
45.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
How does that answer the question or relate to variable reward and addiction mechanisms? This just seems another unrelated negative sentiment argument towards LLMs?
46.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
That is interesting, but also I do wonder, what in life doesn't have a variable reward? You could say that any routine activities like maybe cleaning, etc, is all the same, but most non routine things in life seem like they would have
47.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
How many numbers were in the list?
48.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
Depends on the reason. If there was a valid reason not to release it, then sure. But it's hard for me to see what can be so problematic about releasing a cli wrapper. It's hard to think of anything non political. And politics isn&
49.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
In any case, all I see, is that he built a cool thing, and Google failed to make it work whatever the process was. This is failure on Google's part in my view. Even if he didn't do the proper process, this is just a CLI wrapper, a
50.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
I meant the person got good publicity, not Google. Google got bad publicity.
51.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
In this case I guess the only other option the person had is to quit to build something of their own or work at another more builder friendly company, but at least in this case they got to release a thing that was valuable to many people an
52.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
Going for the little guy who wants to build cool stuff here would be the thing that makes them waste their billions on the wrong thing.
53.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
So if this is a case where they weren't legally in the right, but were morally in the right, which is far more subjective, it makes sense to go the Twitter route since if they were morally in the right people would support them while l
54.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
To me the random guy comes off much more likable here than someone who has spent billions protecting its reputation and still failing.
55.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
I suppose it could be if you did freelance or your own business.
56.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
It depends on how much time it saves me and how much I make per hour generally, right? If AI allows me to cut my time to do something in half on average or allows me to do 2x more it would be worth it to pay up to what my monthly income was
57.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
If you have multiple services in multiple locations however, you may want to replicate this data, so in this case revocation list as it's much smaller would be far easier to replicate for much less latency overhead.
58.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
I think one meaningful case is when you have services in very different locations and you would rather than having to make a request to a session store in a single location, replicate the data to each location for better latency, so in this
59.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
But EU is way behind right?
60.
by mewpmewp2 4mo ago
And which leading country is going to go for allowing other countries to distill their models?

More ›