Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
metalspot
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
> I see it as a chance absolutely. AI is the same as any other software, and open source has to integrate, adapt, and lead to make sure that open source values continue to propagate. my personal approach is to focus on developing with op
32.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
the user prompts and harness used for development are much more valuable for training than the final source code. my approach to open source development with AI now is to include all of the agent sessions used in development in the reposito
33.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
> How is this gloating? he is emphasizing that they used their own words against them. everyone knows the security threat is a pretext. the message is that he is smart and they are stupid and he won, which is what I call gloating. > &
34.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
This is obviously political and the entire narrative is fabrication. David Sacks is publicly gloating about it: https://x.com/DavidSacks/status/2065853007619588171 I can't really say that Anthropic didn'
35.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
I wouldn't use anything but open weights models for developing open source software. This is just training OpenAI and Anthropic to steal your work for their proprietary models.
36.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
corporations and governments fund most linux development. for hardware companies software cost is a tax that decreases their revenue and profit, so Nvidia and AMD have strong incentives to support open source models, which they are, very ac
37.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
The key thing here is that effective intelligence = model capability / cost. If you drive down the cost of inference you can have higher effective capability even with a technically less capable model. There is nothing in Anthropic
38.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
> Fable was the strongest model on the market based on Anthropic's own self promotion. no reason to think that Chinese models are not just as good or better. the key thing here is training on machine code and dis-assembled binaries
39.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
> What's a second generation agent? i meant that i initially developed an agent harness as a set of skills integrated with opencode and now i am in the process of using that to write a new agent from scratch to replace opencode. >
40.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
https://github.com/opensassi/opencode
41.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
i have been using deepseek-v4-flash since it came out. i use a highly structured harness and spec/test driven workflow running through opencode, and so far there has been nothing it can't do. i have run through a bunch of tests: r
42.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
The distinction I would make here is that computer code is logical transformations on arbitrary data, not the actual data itself. An LLM can learn the entire space of logical transformation patterns from existing code, and can hallucinate n
43.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
> glorified autocomplete machine It is a next token prediction function and it is important to understand the technology accurately based on what it actually is. What is unique about a next token prediction function though is that every
44.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
> If you deploy 10x faster, than me as business owner need less of you for the same amount of work An important consideration here is that velocity is not zero sum. If you are delivering in weeks what used to take months you are creating
45.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
> people are driven by different things This is important to understand. I have been coding since I was 11 when I got my first C64, and it is a genuine passion for me, but I also love working with LLM tooling. One of the biggest things f
46.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
Calling it AI is where the problem lies. An LLM is not AI. It is a next token prediction function. That is a very powerful function but just one function out of millions in the overall stack. As an engineer you still have to have the right
47.
▲
by
metalspot
4mo ago
AI accelerates the entire white collar economy and makes it more efficient. It has and will continue to result in large job gains for blue collar and service workers. The people getting rich off AI have to spend their money somewhere.
48.
▲
by
metalspot
5mo ago
I am getting 98.6% cache hit ratio on deepseek-v4-flash with opencode
49.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> CHEQ also provided Mashable with fake traffic data from the entire month of January 2024. TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram all had very similar stats to each platform's respective Super Bowl weekend numbers. Slightly more than 2.8
50.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> keeping otherwise usable hardware out of landfills while i like this idea in theory, in practice the energy efficiency and lower electricity costs of newer hardware mean that in terms of both cost and environmental impact it would prob
51.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> Civil aviation is beer money to Boeing This is completely false. For 2022 fiscal year revenue in commercial was $25B vs $23B for defense and losses in commercial were $2.3B vs $3.5B for defense. https://www.boeing.com/r
52.
▲
Pillars of a Global Monolith
(yottascale.substack.com)
1 points
by
metalspot
3y ago
|
0 comments
53.
▲
Toward a Global Monolith
(yottascale.substack.com)
2 points
by
metalspot
3y ago
|
0 comments
54.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
service oriented architecture is a disaster even in large companies. without a monolithic database and normalized schemas you always end up with a bespoke ad-hoc never-consistent data store. data and results are unverifiable and continually
55.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> the evidence existed but was lost if the virus crossed over from animals to humans then it must be able to cross back over. viruses evolve quickly, but animals don't, and we have plenty of samples of the original virus. all you ha
56.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> nybody that favors one theory over another will come forward to admit that they were wrong to jump to conclusions a probability statement is not wrong just because the less probable thing turns out to happen. lab leak of a non-natural
57.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> something other than a lab leak is plausible of course it is plausible. a priori there is no reason why lab leak is more likely than natural origin. it just comes down to the evidence of what actually happened. what you need to show na
58.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> still wouldn't rule out the possibility of a lab leak but finding an animal that can spread covid with a plausible story for how it cross over to humans in wuhan is a threshold that has not been crossed yet. if anyone could meet t
59.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> nearly impossible to disprove lab leak is dead simple to disprove. all you have to do is find an animal that you can infect with covid and will spread it and you have your proof. many people have been spending a lot of money for years
60.
▲
by
metalspot
3y ago
> China did a bad thing The WIV lab was built by the French with money from many different countries and the research was being done by EcoHealth Alliance with US funding so blaming it on the Chinese is probably not the whole picture. Ec
More ›