messe

5 ms·

31.
by messe 4mo ago
> Although in situ Raman analyses cannot determine whether these organics denote abiotic or biotic sources, the organic association with both depositional and diagenetic minerals and the detection of organics on the martian surface sugge
32.
by messe 4mo ago
> was there for some good reason (security?). To cover the myriad of (sometimes downright stupid) requirements that large enterprises have.
33.
Number Form(en.wikipedia.org)
5 points by messe 4mo ago|0 comments
34.
by messe 4mo ago
In this case, it was not used in a jocular way. It was a British person demonstrating their complete and utter ignorance of the only country they share a land border with, and I will call them out on that any day of the week.
35.
by messe 4mo ago
No, I'm saying that it's associated with a certain outdated and bigoted attitude toward the Irish. Using Éire in English, would be seen as odd. You wouldn't say Deutschland or Danmark. > If I change the rest of the sentenc
36.
by messe 4mo ago
> Eire A nitpick, because it's often a dogwhistle: but almost nobody in Ireland calls it that when speaking English. And that's still incorrect in Irish, the correct spelling is Éire.
37.
by messe 4mo ago
You can own multiple guns and store them at your residence in Denmark. I know a couple of people who do so, admittedly both ex-military. This isn't limited to shotguns or bolt action rifles for hunting. You can own up to six handguns.
38.
by messe 5mo ago
Umm, yes? My contact information is attached to the business names I trade under? Which is publicly available information. Is this an alien concept to you?
39.
by messe 5mo ago
Yes... if you want to do business with people, then those people want to know who they do business with. What a fucking tragedy. I'm sorry you have to live in such a socialist hellscape.
40.
by messe 5mo ago
Precisely what inconvenience does it actually cause those businesses?
41.
by messe 5mo ago
On a similar note: There was a period post-Brexit when I hadn't moved away from Ireland yet during which I also did my best to avoid UK produced goods too. Now that was a lot harder though due to the UK still being in the single mark
42.
by messe 5mo ago
Actually, it's not. Speaking from experience. I'm a sample size of one, but that's still one better than your extrapolation from zero. One of the local supermarket chains here in Denmark (Salling Group) even puts a star on th
43.
by messe 5mo ago
It doesn't have local hidden variables. That's an important distinction. I'm not sure a non-local hidden variable explanation of QM is any distinct from superdeterminism though.
44.
by messe 5mo ago
It was far from exactly like that. GR was in part prompted by the precession of the perihelion of mercury for which there was plenty of data.
45.
by messe 5mo ago
> Linux developers should be doing a lot more of this. We should be making everything work better for us without caring how it's going to impact other irrelevant platforms Linux developers already do. Using a BSD can already be a pa
46.
by messe 6mo ago
Apologies, and noted. I wasn't my usual self, which is honestly what prompted me to give in to replying to them. I usually try to do better, and will do in future.
47.
by messe 6mo ago
A fun first project would be something to cultivate bitter almonds, and then isolate the cyanide compounds from them. I don't know what you'd do with the cyanide compounds. But maybe you could get some inspiration from the current
48.
by messe 6mo ago
The fact that both our comments are being downvoted is dumb. Over the last year, the vibe on site has become... concerning. Yeah, it's always leaned right wing capitalist. That's fine by itself—I like the contrast to my own views
49.
by messe 6mo ago
This isn't an example of that. You claimed something in your initial comment. You did not back it up. I'm asking you to back up your initial claim. If you had addressed it you'd have a point, and that would be a correct exam
50.
by messe 6mo ago
> 1) Be the only ones to follow the letter of the law, break a lot of people's expectations, and catch backlash for disrupting traffic Yes, they should do that. The fact that others don't follow it is completely irrelevant. I&#
51.
by messe 6mo ago
[flagged]
52.
by messe 6mo ago
> This is why they often have a massively higher rate of fatalities It wouldn't perhaps be because they're (a) forced to share a space with cars and (b) cars have crumple zones, unlike cyclists?
53.
by messe 7mo ago
Good point. I said it above, but I'll repeat it here that I shouldn't have discounted how frequent once offs can be. I've worked in support before so I really should've known better
54.
by messe 7mo ago
You make some good points. I've worked in support before, so I shouldn't have discounted how frequent "once-offs" can be.
55.
by messe 7mo ago
Fair, but for a once-off thing performance isn't usually a major factor. The comment I was replying to implied this was something more regular. EDIT: why is this being downvoted? I didn't think I was rude. The person I responded t
56.
by messe 7mo ago
So what's the use case for keeping them in that format rather than something more easily indexed and queryable? I'd probably just shove it all into Postgres, but even a multi terabyte SQLite database seems more reasonable.
57.
by messe 7mo ago
Now I'm really curious. What field are you in that ndjson files of that size are common? I'm sure there are reasons against switching to something more efficient–we've all been there–I'm just surprised.
58.
by messe 7mo ago
> No one cares at amateur level Except people clearly fucking do for some reason, and all that's going to happen is make life worse for women both cis and trans. Trans women will get excluded, and cis women who are "too good&qu
59.
by messe 7mo ago
Or just follow web standards and define and publish your User-Agent header, so that people can block that as needed. You're creating the wrong kind of value. I really hope your company fails, as its success implies a failure of the web
60.
by messe 7mo ago
Because they're probably a native speaker. EDIT: this is exactly the kind of mistake that native speakers make, that ESL speakers don't.

More ›