merlindru

9 ms·

31.
by merlindru 4mo ago
Could make it disable-able only from the terminal in recovery mode. That one would be too hard / bothersome to fend off most cases I feel like
32.
by merlindru 5mo ago
How can you be sure you weren't placebo'ing yourself into feeling it? To my knowledge creatine has no significant effects until your levels rise after, say, a week of taking daily
33.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Tosche also has a very well made "Comic Code" font with ligatures
34.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Recursive is terrifically legible, especially with Casual all the way on. I couldn't tell you why, but reading code feels much, much more natural with it than with most other fonts. Perhaps it's the high degree of separation bec
35.
by merlindru 5mo ago
yes but the compensation part is the problem An 80h week should not be compensated the same as two 40h weeks
36.
by merlindru 5mo ago
it's just extrapolation. it's (revenue of this month) * 12 in other words, "if every month was as good as this one, here's how much we'd make in a year" that means, of course, if you make $1000 in janu
37.
by merlindru 5mo ago
But is there any reason to state something like that publicly if you don't believe it? I certainly think that someone smart enough to be that deceptive would also realize it's not a great look, or at least highly questionable with
38.
by merlindru 5mo ago
surely training also gets cheaper so justifying it becomes easier? i think it'll be more like we get 1-10T models and then distill those down into smaller models, though It seems like the best small models today are all distilled from
39.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Same. 4.7 felt like a definite regression
40.
by merlindru 5mo ago
i highly disagree with that framing. the essence of a program is not the fact that people have been running it you could write a great program and never run it. does that mean the program does now not exist? or that it is not a new, unique
41.
by merlindru 5mo ago
the proof is on github; it's true
42.
by merlindru 5mo ago
sorry i had missed this! this is extremely interesting. thank you for sharing. i thought about this approach and came to the same conclusions as the reddit thread you shared. then again, it probably works fine for 80% of cases...
43.
by merlindru 5mo ago
how do you square that with the "no LLM translators" rule? i agree i dont think they hate LLMs but that one seems unreasonable and odd, and makes me wonder if its ideological after all
44.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Jarred had tweeted that they're using the rust version internally with Claude Code
45.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Gotta be a seeding issue. If it's not, and you can prove it, you're about to be a little famous probably :P
46.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Location: Germany Remote: Yes Willing to relocate: Yes, especially for great fit Technologies: Great with TypeScript. React, Svelte, Vue, Solid, all things frontend. UI/UX design. Love Rust and Zig. Ethereum/Web3. Some cryptograph
47.
by merlindru 5mo ago
That's how I got into this thing in the first place, hah. Golden advice. It's incredibly cool to see what some apps offer. More of them have great accessibility support than you think (or at least than I thought!)
48.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Not really IMO, webmcp has devs change their apps. invoke just works with existing apps, especially ones that are accessible invoke rather has overlap with Claude's and Codex' computer-use, except the steps are stored/scripte
49.
by merlindru 5mo ago
i'm not too familiar with browserbase, but invoke works with any macOS app (or at least the accessible ones), i think browserbase is only for browser usage. in the context of this blog post, the conclusion looks similar though! "
50.
by merlindru 5mo ago
i think this goes both ways too :) agents have been a boon for everyone with disabilities, carpal tunnel, RSI, ADHD, anything and now the fact that interfaces need to be accessible to agents, not just humans, ironically increases it for hum
51.
by merlindru 5mo ago
shit, why didn't i think of that i tend to think of invoke as "an API over macOS apps" tho... doesn't `invoke finder shareAndCopyLink` read very nicely? :P
52.
by merlindru 5mo ago
this is protected against at the OS level, provided the applications declare the input correctly as a SecureTextField. i so far haven't found any application that doesn't. all you're able to get out, as far as i can tell, is
53.
by merlindru 5mo ago
ah, i see what you're saying. fair point! though the argument was that LLMs essentially are a yet higher level programming language (or, rather, let you write in a higher level language).
54.
by merlindru 5mo ago
I'm building something that fixes this exact problem[1]. The landing page doesn't advertise it yet, but essentially, I give agents a small set of tools to explore apps' surfaces, and then an API over common macOS functions, e
55.
by merlindru 5mo ago
User of your tool here - I think matcha is awesome. Wildly useful and would consider paying even though it just got released. Applied for Design and Full-stack roles :)
56.
by merlindru 5mo ago
I don't think most JavaScript devs know how to read C code, let alone assembly, so I think the comparison is apt. Is it not?
57.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Bun folks routinely contribute to WebKit, and bun itself is an incredibly impressive project, so I don't think they're lacking expertise
58.
by merlindru 5mo ago
wrong thread, you're looking for this one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47976154
59.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Agree, but "no LLMs" locks out good PRs and contributors too. I hypothesize it may have roughly the same effect as denying all contributions where the author used intellisense 10y ago. A substantial portion of people who write goo
60.
by merlindru 5mo ago
Hi, I don't see any contact form or email address on northbeamstudio.gumroad.com I have an idea you might be interested in.

More ›