Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
menaerus
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
181.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Outdated, opinionated, platform-specific, and incorrect.
182.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Their profile generally comes up here on HN very often with Dunning-Kruger effect like comments so it makes me believe it is no AI. AI would do a better analysis, for the better or worse.
183.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Implementing a Redis and Kafka rewrite (in Rust) but with workload-aware and self-balancing JIT-like engine deployed at Datadog-scale is no fluff. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.
184.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
So you read the three-part series of blogs that are packed in details in 3 minutes after I shared the link and put yourself into a position of entitled opinion and calling my position a silly take? Sure thing.
185.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Let someone from the Redox team go read [1], [2], and [3]. If they still insist on keeping their position then ... well. The industry is being redefined as we speak and everyone doing the push-back are pushing against themselves really. [1]
186.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Yes, there aren't and it's a quite competitive market too.
187.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
6500 EUR net in Berlin/Munich would equate to ~140k EUR gross. For a FAANG salary, considering that startups pay these figures for similar expertise, I would expect more. What level is that if you don't mind sharing?
188.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
What does it mean "remotely competitive combustion engines"? China has been building ICEs for decades, that's for sure, and if they had not been anywhere to remotely competitive people wouldn't be buying them and therefo
189.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
I agree with some of your points, they make sense, but China has been building combustion engines too, for a very long time which is why I don't think that sidestepping the technology with EV was the main reason for their success
190.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Truth that not many are ready or want to hear.
191.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Yes, I agree, and my experience is the same - there's just too many folks getting stuck in that mindset and never leaving it. Looking into the history I think software engineering domain has a lot of cargo-cult, which is somewhat surpr
192.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Yeah ... and so it happens that this particular function in the profile is just a symptom, merely being an observation (single) data point of system behavior under given workload, and not the root cause for, let's say, load instruction
193.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Sure, this is why I said likely. If you are good in both then I believe this isn't something commonly found in people.
194.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Maybe you can learn to be mediocre or good enough designer or similarly good enough or mediocre engineer. But I don't think you can actually learn to be a great designer or great engineer - it just takes a different set of skills and e
195.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
> Honestly, if you're bottlenecking on singleton access, that's design smell worth addressing, not the guard variable. There's a large group of engineers who are totally unaware of Amdahl's law and they are consequent
196.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
To my understanding this is akin to what profile-guided optimization (PGO) in C or C++ does.
197.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Why not? Even without LLMs it is technically feasible to build custom database engine that performs much better than general database kernels. And we see this happening all the time, with timeseries, BLOBs, documents, OLTP, OLAP, logging et
198.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
If you look into the results, you will see that they are able to execute 5x TPC-H queries in ~200ms (total). The dataset is not large it is rather small (10GB) but nonetheless, you wouldn't be able to run 5 queries in such a small amou
199.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
Over-hiring is a myth IMO. Company wanting to hire essentially has two options: (1) hire from the pool of fresh candidates coming out of the Universities, (2) hire people who are already employed. This means that to inflate the numbers of s
200.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
No, that's not how I believe they intended it to work. They generate the workload-specific engine up-front and not when the query arrives.
201.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
It has different limitations but inefficiency doesn't seem likely to be one of them. Did you read the Experimental Results section? > Figure 2 shows the experimental results, and GenDB outperforms all baselines on every query in bot
202.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
You have to rebuild the factory and manufacturing process I guess. Humanoid robot is a drop in replacement for human requiring no intervention
203.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
It makes sense when you find out that there's only so much humans who want to do and are capable of doing that type of work. Also, robots are cheaper, and they are the opposite of humans - theyt are not emotional, lazy, feeling fatigue
204.
▲
by
menaerus
7mo ago
They all look the same, e.g. like sh*t IMO, so although the above statement sounds overgeneralized it doesn't meant that it doesn't generalize well. IME it does.
205.
▲
by
menaerus
8mo ago
Someone is already working on it: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.02081
206.
▲
by
menaerus
8mo ago
> Because this is what "mimics" index scan (without prefetch) on cold data. More or less. This is an interesting observation but does it really mimic the index scan? This would be essentially a worst case scenario. Submitting I
207.
▲
by
menaerus
8mo ago
> fio --filename=device name --direct=1 --rw=randread --bs=4k --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=256 --runtime=120 --numjobs=4 --time_based --group_reporting --name=iops-test-job --eta-newline=1 --readonly > -> read: IOPS=19.1k, BW=149MiB
208.
▲
by
menaerus
8mo ago
No, it's not mythical but it is vastly more difficult and more complex than the majority of other software engineering roles. Entry barrier being lower elsewhere is not something I would argue at all. It's a common sense. Unless y
209.
▲
by
menaerus
8mo ago
Ah, I see. Thanks for the example. I think I understand now. In C++ problem of monomorphization, or potential bloat due to excessive template instantiations, is normally handled at the linker level but can be controlled at the code level to
210.
▲
by
menaerus
8mo ago
That's polymorhpism 101, and not quite what I was asking. From my understanding what Rust has is something different to what C++ is offering. In C++ you either opt-in for static- or dynamic-dispatch. In Rust it seems that you can mix b
More ›