melezhik

4 ms·

31.
by melezhik 2mo ago
I like the idea, thanks
32.
by melezhik 2mo ago
In the systems I am familiar with one has to explicitly describe jobs artifacts via YAML files as dependencies, for the most cases it’s not needed as all I need is to pass files between jobs. I don’t want explicit syntax for that, just sh
33.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Ok, maybe I will need to add better wording , but the idea stays the same unlike in many ci systems ( GitHub/gitlab/etc pipeline code is general purpose programming language not YAML ), if you read further jobs/tasks you will
34.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Yep - tiny , simple structured YAML on the top ( only to list jobs technically) everything else is general purpose programming languages
35.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Oh. It’s just a typo. Why it’s worse ?
36.
CI jobs artifacts should not be difficult(deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io)
19 points by melezhik 2mo ago|15 comments
37.
by melezhik 2mo ago
IN DSCI CI artifacts are easy, every job can create a file inside ~/artifacts directory and all subsequent will see it. If any job remove a file for ~/artifacts all the subsequent jobs won't see it. So artifacts works as a pi
38.
by melezhik 2mo ago
- long ci builds usually means bad code / architecture . CI should not be very heavy and should not take a lot of time. - jobs do not look like, they are indeed written on gp languages, no magic here - run_task / task_var are just
39.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Yep. The same feeling )
40.
by melezhik 2mo ago
What is more complex user experience? Writing pipelines on YAML gets complex indeed CI should not be any different from regular programming
41.
by melezhik 2mo ago
- you don’t need runners on remote machines unless you you have hundreds of jobs and which never happens for small or medium size dev teams - job matrix / parallel jobs are barely needed in commercial development , only in open source
42.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Try dsci / it’s super simple
43.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Whoever downvoted this ^^ my comment I need your reasoning … I don’t know why people hate simplicity ) ( or love complexity )
44.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Ok, with DSCI as monolith application where git and CI are the same server, 32GB RAM VM is more then enough , no need to host runners, no need in k8s cluster, no need in dedicated maintain team, so no extra costs on devops tasks ... Also w
45.
by melezhik 2mo ago
You may consider dsci as its ci is baked in and it uses general programming languages directly as the first class citizens
46.
by melezhik 2mo ago
DSCI - http://deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io - lightweight ( single binary written on golang ) - ci runner embedded ( podman / docker ) - pipelines are written on general programming languages - no YAML craziness - Perl/Py
47.
by melezhik 2mo ago
If someone needs lightweight self hosted git server with ci pipelines via general programming languages - consider DSCI - http://deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io
48.
by melezhik 2mo ago
This is demo server, full documentation is available here - http://deadsimpleci.sparrowhub.io/doc/README
49.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Thanks for such a detailed thoughts … I have started demo server btw - http://dsci.sparrowhub.io/
50.
DSCI – self hosted Git server and CI for developers(dsci.sparrowhub.io)
3 points by melezhik 2mo ago|1 comments
51.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Ah. Ok
52.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Usually once MR is merged , no need to change existing branch and people usually just create a new one to push more changes or I miss something ?
53.
by melezhik 2mo ago
Or just vote here - https://fosstodon.org/@melezhik/117064923185870206
54.
Ask HN: What part of modern Git hosting system is the most crucial one for you
1 points by melezhik 2mo ago|7 comments
55.
Text and Test Anything Protocol(dtap.sparrowhub.io)
1 points by melezhik 3mo ago|0 comments
56.
by melezhik 3mo ago
Yep. Say for my dsci framework , I ask AI to convert gh actions pipelines to dsci , and the ratio of successful code generations vs hallucination is very important , need to have it high
57.
by melezhik 3mo ago
Another take . If a (my) product is easy for AI to work with - I call it LLMable - that’s good metric or sign I move in the right direction . AI just guidelines me in that sense …
58.
by melezhik 3mo ago
I consider AI generated stuff as a raw material , never as a product ready to be consumed by any public clients
59.
by melezhik 3mo ago
I like that one “ They understand what they're asking the model to produce. They review generated code with the same critical eye they'd apply to a junior engineer's pull request. They bring architectural thinking to the con
60.
Migrating Raku DBIish gh actions pipeline to DSCI(gemini.google.com)
1 points by melezhik 3mo ago|0 comments

More ›