mejari

13 ms·

91.
by mejari 9y ago
No, it compared individual students' grades before and after they lost access to recreational marijuana. They mention the local students because it was a group where no event happened so it helps show that there wasn't some other
92.
by mejari 9y ago
Except this isn't an experiment, where they control the conditions. It's monitoring natural behavior. Just saying "placebo" makes no sense for this kind of study. That'd be like asking for a placebo in a national po
93.
by mejari 9y ago
>Source? The bottom half-dozen comments on this article?
94.
by mejari 9y ago
They said it's a reasonable assumption to believe your private keys likely weren't compromised. That's not the same as saying it's reasonable to not move the coins anyway.
95.
by mejari 9y ago
I'm hoping the employee pictures at the bottom are after examples, otherwise there's no excuse for being that blurry.
96.
by mejari 9y ago
As mentioned in the article, this species only appeared in the area 4 years ago, so I doubt removing them would be an issue to our immune system.
97.
by mejari 9y ago
>who cares if he's arrogant? There's hundreds of big corporations manipulating media for financial gains. That's a hell of a non-sequitor
98.
by mejari 9y ago
The likelihood of successfully prosecuting a crime does not affect the reality of whether or not that crime occurred.
99.
by mejari 9y ago
You didn't answer their question.
100.
by mejari 9y ago
That's fundamentally not the "logic that is keeping us in this two party system". That logic is the logic of understanding our current electoral system. The US electoral system as it currently stands will inevitably result in
101.
by mejari 9y ago
And now a "he also said", given his new statement admitting to the allegations.
102.
by mejari 9y ago
The "defendant" has already admitted to the accusations and stepped down.
103.
by mejari 9y ago
>A private company owned by the very people who apparently did the breach. Dmitri Alperovitc is Russian and owns Crowdstrike, the company that did the 'investigation'. All Russians are not members of the Russian government... &
104.
by mejari 9y ago
The servers were investigated directly by a private company that specialized in such things, that the FBI regularly works with, and the results were handed over. It's really not that strange for an organization to balk at handing over
105.
by mejari 9y ago
Those allegations caused the leader of the group to take refuge in a nation's embassy and stay there for years. They seem incredibly relevant to the organization, regardless of it's "purpose".
106.
by mejari 9y ago
What you call cheating others call innovation. You have a personal view of what a "boat" is, but that doesn't mean it's shared by everyone, even just within the boating community. I think the person designing this boat w
107.
by mejari 9y ago
Submarines generally aren't sail-powered.
108.
by mejari 9y ago
And what would be wrong with that? The goal is to have the shortest length of boat, a common measurement in boating. Obviously to achieve that you have to be clever with the attributes of the boat not under restriction. I'm sure no one
109.
by mejari 9y ago
He's 33, hardly a "kid"
110.
by mejari 9y ago
I've been told that a big selling point for Kotlin is that it was developed from actual usage and production rather than some of the more academic languages solving abstract (although still interesting) problems that day-to-day develop
111.
by mejari 9y ago
Whether or not they're above it, there isn't any evidence that they've done it.
112.
by mejari 9y ago
I don't get the problem with that either? Being an "artist", or "making apps" aren't hallowed titles. Are you treating it more like they're saying "You'll be a super successful musician" or
113.
by mejari 9y ago
> But 'getting started making music' is like you only need their product, trigger some samples and you can be an artist too. I mean, is that wrong? Unless you stick to some elitist definition of artist, why is someone who plays
114.
by mejari 9y ago
Closer to this: https://xkcd.com/1831/
115.
by mejari 9y ago
Why is that the real question?
116.
by mejari 9y ago
Did you read the article? The drone pilot says he never flew over the person's property.
117.
by mejari 10y ago
It's not even a leak, it's just a tweet from WikiLeaks quoting a public article from 2005.
118.
by mejari 10y ago
This isn't a WikiLeaks release, though. They're just quoting an article and making up a connection. You should treat WikiLeaks as a source of information, same as any other, and shouldn't trust unsupported claims they make.
119.
by mejari 10y ago
For your first paragraph I agree, the Constitution does reinforce a 2-party system, but obviously the Republicans and Democrats didn't create the Constitution. For your second paragraph, do you have examples of the "onerous requir
120.
by mejari 10y ago
WikiLeaks quotes a 2005 NYTimes article in a tweet that tunnels exist that were financed by the CIA and fabricates idea that the exact tunnels involved in the recent strike were directly built by the CIA. Nothing coming from an actual lea

More ›