Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mehrzad
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
241.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
>their is obviously no other solution I don't like it in games, but for applications a freemium model (I hate the buzzword too) seems to be best for developers. Charge for extra features, like Instapaper, App.net, etc. Or go the route o
242.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
For Firefox set, Duckduckgo as the URL Bar search engine (somewhere in about:config) and Startpage as the right click search.
243.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
>"Native" advertising, a.k.a. sponsored content Which is fine. If you're gonna have an ad I can't avoid but doesn't significantly slow down page load, fine with me.
244.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
https://getsatisfaction.com/feedly/topics/chrome_app_permiss... This answered here.
245.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Feedly depends on Google Reader for now, IIRC. edit: They're fixing it! http://blog.feedly.com/2013/03/14/google-reader/
246.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
>Firefox needs restarting all the time when I change extensions Because the extensions are more powerful.
247.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
I'd rather support Firefox, to be honest. I still like a lot of what Google does, fwiw.
248.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Not open source, IIRC.
249.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Which is unstable and does not auto update without writing a script. Google wants you to use Chrome and not Chromium.
250.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
NoScript has a similar feature ironically.
251.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Because for some people it might actually be worth it to buy a $200 and pay $60+ dollars a month for a more premium service, than $600 and $30+ for a cheaper deal. Outlawing locking phones would drive phone prices up, I'd think.
252.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Play By Your Own Rules, but host your blog on someone else's site.
253.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
I think it's part of the joke.
254.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Solution: use a different browser. Other browsers on Android do have certain benefits. Opera has userscripts, Firefox has add-ons.
255.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
I hear people make this claim. How does it make sense? A negative times a negative makes a positive. An evil person dying is a good thing. The only thing worth debate is if the person is evil or not.
256.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
I thought this might be why. Fair enough, not a bad feature.
257.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Personally I find it annoying that <tag> is displayed as <tag >. I never understood why this is.
258.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
It would show it for me over and over, but suddenly stopped. Maybe installing Ghostery and ABP helped?
259.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
I thought that the latest browser tests showed that FF used less ram than Chrome. http://lifehacker.com/5976082/browser-speed-tests-chrome-24-... Unfortunately, reputations stick.
260.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
I hope App.net does well, but I (and I think others) would prefer a more open solution. Tent is doing OK so far, but we need something like IRC (which is still doing great).
261.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
It should work in Firefox Aurora as well, IIRC.
262.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Possible business models for a service: 1. Free with ads 2. Freemium a la ADN 3. Free without ads (Tent, IRC) What looks nicest to the consumer?
263.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Why not use something better in the meantime?
264.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Youtube Center is probably miles ahead of both of those.
265.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
But we do. Any type of editing software (open source or not) has some kind of "project file." Trent Reznor was called the first open source musician because he shared his .band files from Garageband.
266.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
I feel like we as nerds should think in the long term. Communication should be controlled by the users. Think about all the companies who were screwed over by Facebook's "Likegate." Decentralization is why I prefer Tent and IRC. App.net see
267.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Privacy is one reason, but not a very good one. For the "Open Tabs" sync, privacy is a very good reason.
268.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
Obviously this is ridiculous, but I find it just absurd. Who are the ISPs to tell their customers what is morally and legally right or wrong? Are we not allowed to have a reverse method where we penalize the ISPs for their crimes? Of cour
269.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
But better for the web. Maybe some of their ideas aren't feasible but at least they get people to talk/think about this stuff.
270.
▲
by
mehrzad
14y ago
>I've long found it a bit ironic... I've always thought it as a Darwinian thing. Some programmers probably believe "I use ads for money but I block all the other ones because I have the intelligence to do so and anyone who doesn't is a
More ›