mehrant

5 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by mehrant 2y ago

   thanks for taking time to write a feedback :) > That's a false contradistinction: Redis is also disk persisted. The performance gain mentioned was vs. Redis in memory. so we weren't claiming that Redis can't be persisted (
2. 32.▲
   by mehrant 2y ago

   that's a fair point and you're correct. we will have the SLAs for latency documented and provided soon. in the mean time, please try it out and give us your feedback :)
3. 33.▲
   by mehrant 2y ago

   our approach is actually hybrid. on the other side of the performance coin, we have resource efficiency. that resource efficiency let's us provide a performant and low latency managed KV store, with lower cost, so the economy of it mak
4. 34.▲
   by mehrant 2y ago

   correct. however we're actually planning to make the system open source in future; we can't set an exact date as it depends on various factors, but hopefully not too far out. :)
5. 35.▲
   Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is faster than Redis(hpkv.io)

   79 points by mehrant 2y ago|75 comments