mehh

17 ms·

151.
by mehh 9y ago
GA can be used for topology and parameter tweaking.
152.
by mehh 9y ago
Did some stoopid bot right that article?
153.
by mehh 9y ago
Well its a Database Right, which is a property right rather than copyright. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sui_generis_database_right As with all rights, it varies with jurisdiction.
154.
by mehh 9y ago
Whilst that is your opinion, it is not a fact, nor is it legally valid.
155.
by mehh 9y ago
I suspect we don't need your permission as under the terms of use of this sight you forfeit your rights to this user generated content, and the rights now belong to Hacker News.
156.
by mehh 9y ago
Quite likely yes they are the owners of your data.
157.
by mehh 9y ago
Being able to do so doesn't make it legal. If you have permission for one thing it doesn't mean you have permission for something different.
158.
by mehh 9y ago
Culture labels things, and we are trained with that.
159.
by mehh 9y ago
Self awareness?
160.
by mehh 9y ago
Self awareness?
161.
by mehh 9y ago
Hmm is this not the same argument that the classical AI gave with a few more rules and it will be alive!
162.
by mehh 9y ago
Trying hard to resist saying this, but all I can think of is "infinite polygon engine" ...
163.
by mehh 9y ago
Painful paper to read because of the inaccurate use of the word 'imagination'. I'm sure the guys who wrote this are smart enough to know its not imagination (perhaps arguably a small subset of the attributes that contribute t
164.
by mehh 9y ago
Or "adding a few more rules" to a symbolic system ...
165.
by mehh 9y ago
I fully agree with the above responses, and I am optimistic about major break throughs, however like many of you guys, I don't think we should just assume a bit more horsepower and things will magically work.
166.
by mehh 9y ago
Each neutron as an individual process is indeed interesting but no so much if your using backprop for the training algorithm as it doesn't really fit the paradigm.
167.
by mehh 9y ago
In theory a convoluted solution could, in practice not so much.
168.
by mehh 9y ago
Yeah thats fine, freedom of choice and a better experience for users, sounds pragmatic to me. Much better than the many posts here trying to force their opinion on the world!
169.
by mehh 9y ago
Wat?
170.
by mehh 9y ago
Well if you monetised your OSS maybe you wouldn't need your first job, maybe you could just work on projects you actually wanted to.
171.
by mehh 9y ago
Same old nonsense answers here. 1. Because companies don't want to pay license fees, so then don't use the damn software, who cares. 2. Oh you should just beg for handouts instead, because your effort and work isn't worth cr
172.
by mehh 9y ago
Is it worth linking to paywall articles?
173.
by mehh 9y ago
I disagree :)
174.
by mehh 9y ago
That's a lot of money for a site I have never heard of!
175.
by mehh 9y ago
Its not about programming skill, its about focusing on the right thing. Many very technically good developers can be very productive at engineering stuff no one needs.
176.
by mehh 10y ago
Big Data + Blockchain + AI, looks quite hand wavy, have you found a practical use case for BigchainDB yet?
177.
by mehh 10y ago
http://www.clixta.com
178.
by mehh 10y ago
"Like it or not your future applications will run in a micro kernel." Fixed that for you ;)
179.
by mehh 10y ago
Sure, but now the use of rich javascript clients enables a bunch of use cases and workflows and interactions that was previously not possible. It has enriched the user experience, some times unnecessarily, but thats down to the implementer
180.
by mehh 10y ago
I'd argue the code you have written should help with identifying errors, its not something that comes for free.

More ›