meh2frdf

10 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   In the 90s, z-notation was taught in many UK CS courses.
2. 62.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   They don’t want google or any other monopoly that is in competition with them to ‘give’ them traffic. They do want their services available and indexed on the internet. If the internet search market was evenly distributed among 5 search en
3. 63.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   Why?
4. 64.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   This is a very poor argument even under basic scrutiny.
5. 65.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   Because google owns the index, if they don’t allow google to index they get no traffic. Google is a monopoly, there is no choice here, no market driving competition.
6. 66.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   Fair enough :)
7. 67.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   So you would need a change internationally to copyright law, and then for YouTube to limit the number of viewers to a video (which doesn’t make much business sense). There are a lot of opinions on how copyright should work, however little u
8. 68.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   With python and node typically comes a different approach to developing which should mean those tools are less useful.
9. 69.▲
   by meh2frdf 8y ago

   I don’t think those networks you mention are good measures at all. Most of the great and passionate devs I know are not prolific on those sites. IMHO those sites are more often for new people to tech who like to showboat, and are likely t
10. 70.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Well that is what copyright upholds. The problem is there is no simple way you can get a license for the video clip from the rights holders. And then no sensible way of verifying that license with the platform.
11. 71.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    I suspect it’s deliberate, as it supports Google’s agenda of exploiting others work for free.
12. 72.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Really a down vote for a C joke, or did you not get it?
13. 73.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Couldn’t watch the whole thing, was so naff, with grating ‘tension’ music, simply ghastly! At times I actually thought it was a spoof.
14. 74.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Your best guess +1 ;)
15. 75.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Same way you eat an elephant!
16. 76.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Nor does my infra code, because I write tests, and have a pre-prod end to test it in a controlled ci approach.
17. 77.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Try using a modelling tool rather than a drawing tool.
18. 78.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Blazegraph is now an Amazon owned trademark, good luck defending your name!
19. 79.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    What are you hoping to achieve? If it’s to screw them for as much money as possible speak to a lawyer who can advise you on the best strategy for that. If you want a small/reasonable amount of compensation and failing that, you want th
20. 80.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Is this in anyway related to blazegraph the gpu accelerated database?
21. 81.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    In terms of people moving away from java, I would say yes. It’s a smaller leap than Scala and an easier sale to management. Quite a lot of teams that have moved to Scala have struggled, mostly around supporting the new shiny services that
22. 82.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    I knew this discussion would end up discussing the type systems. That is really quite removed from business goals with very weak evidence that it will provide any real benefits to the business. It’s quite debatable even from an engineering
23. 83.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Replace deep learning with ANN, it was branded DL In order to get easier grant funding!
24. 84.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Engaging isn’t sufficient, it’s a start. What is typically lacking is someone with the intelligence to properly understand the problem, and map out a roadmap to get there. There is too often a naive belief that the stakeholders will put y
25. 85.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    So what would that transition look like, how would you phase the roll out? Practically how would this work and would the result be worth the effort to each individual involved or would it be a utopian ideal for ‘the greater good’?
26. 86.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Best description yet!
27. 87.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    5 years ha! Wow the rebranding has worked well.
28. 88.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    Give us a list then, because what I’m seeing is shoehorning “AI” into everything but not with significant results.
29. 89.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    The fact you use the word connectionism makes you alright in my book :)
30. 90.▲
    by meh2frdf 8y ago

    I hate it when people say deep learning instead of neural networks.