meetingcpp

6 ms·

31.
Subtle bugs through leaking(meetingcpp.com)
1 points by meetingcpp 10y ago|0 comments
32.
An interview with Sean Parent(meetingcpp.com)
1 points by meetingcpp 10y ago|0 comments
33.
by meetingcpp 10y ago
boost::variant is 12 years old, the std::variant version is not based on the actual design nor is it a copy of the boost implementation. The interface is very similar, but the implementation is ofc using C++17 and not C++03.
34.
Final features of C++17(meetingcpp.com)
150 points by meetingcpp 10y ago|101 comments
35.
The C++ Hightlights and more of GCC 6.1(meetingcpp.com)
1 points by meetingcpp 10y ago|0 comments
36.
Asynchrony and Coroutines – Grigory Demchenko – Meeting C++ 2015(youtube.com)
1 points by meetingcpp 10y ago|0 comments
37.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
Whats holding you back then? Eric Nieblers Range-v3 library is available: https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/ Its not going to be (much) better in the standard... Except that it would use real concepts then..
38.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
The very first link is a link to the previous part of the series.
39.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
Well, they have been accepted into the standard last week ;)
40.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
Well, there is progress on all features, yet nothing is ready to go into C++17. So either we get no new standard at all, or we get a Standard without the large features. Also C++14 was a step forward, generic lambdas are a step forward (boo
41.
C++17 and other future highlights of C++(meetingcpp.com)
129 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|47 comments
42.
Awaiting for the ranges: C++17 – Ivan Cukic – Meeting C++ 2015(youtube.com)
1 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
43.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
Well, boost::filesystem exists for ages...
44.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
No, that is not dropped, but it also is not contained in a TS yet, I'm not sure if it gets added to C++17. There is a wording paper: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/
45.
C++17 and its Technical Specifications(meetingcpp.com)
87 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|68 comments
46.
Selecting by interface, an idea almost to good to be true(meetingcpp.com)
1 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
47.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
If you can, go for C++14 directly, it offers improvements over C++11. Language features that ease your daily working with C++11/14: - Lambdas, especially when working with <algorithm> - ranged for loop - auto instead of typing lo
48.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
Yes, that is correct. That is not possible, modules might offer things in this direction.
49.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
um, nope, not going to happen... C++ did that in the 2000's, in that time there wasn't much news about standardization, because of this C++ was seen as legacy, people moved to other languages. The new languages such as Rust, Go et
50.
by meetingcpp 11y ago
Well, that has been done for decades. You just need to link your code with the correct libraries. Its probably a bit easier with C as it has a common ABI, and C# as it only has one tool chain, and not multiple toolchains from multiple vendo
51.
Current Proposals for C++17(meetingcpp.com)
66 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|36 comments
52.
From Iterators to Ranges: The Upcoming Evolution of the STL(youtube.com)
3 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
53.
Searching and replacing in strings with boost(meetingcpp.com)
1 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
54.
Considerations for choosing the parallel computing strategy(youtube.com)
2 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
55.
Raw loops vs. STL algorithms(meetingcpp.com)
2 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
56.
Effective Qt – Marc Mutz – Meeting C++ 2015(youtube.com)
3 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
57.
Developing an embedded application for the IoT(youtube.com)
3 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
58.
C++ User Group Meetings in February(meetingcpp.com)
1 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments
59.
An Introduction to C++ Coroutines [video](youtube.com)
49 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|4 comments
60.
Using parallelism with boost::future(meetingcpp.com)
2 points by meetingcpp 11y ago|0 comments

More ›