meerita

47 ms·

1. 631.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   This article gave me chills of full product manager stack developer: a guy who will be involved in all things to the point he makes it all.
2. 632.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   Everyone should start using Brave or Firefox and DuckDuckGo and stop using all Google things as much as possible.
3. 633.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   I think if you provide an IDE that solves everything it will become like a calc, when people stoped making mental excersices in favor of typing the problem and get the insntant result of it.
4. 634.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   Programming with encoding structural annotations in string names (BEM, object-oriented approach) is useless in the long term. By long, I say one year of cycle development for any medium or big project. The CSS will grow and the architecture
5. 635.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   If you relieve the programmer of thinking where his error is and give him the fix, the programmer will not bother to reason out what the solution is, he will simply expect it from you.
6. 636.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   Wouldn't that create worse programmers?
7. 637.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   My country, Argentina, got down to 66 of 73 countries tested in the PISA tests. The education system there went on to a process of destruction in matter of 20 years.
8. 638.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   I'm more than happy with DuckDuckGo. I would love more specialized search engines. Back in the day I've used several search engines depending the task i needed to perform, from Altavista to Yahoo to Google.
9. 639.▲
   by meerita 7y ago

   By looking at the header, looks like it's tablet/phone design oriented. Even the buttons look like made for tapping.
10. 640.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    I can't see it. > An error occurred when connecting to firefox-replay.com. PR_CONNECT_RESET_ERROR
11. 641.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    I'm sure nobody is laid off just because they were doing "union activities". That's the problem I see: label everything as "union activity", therefore, someone can become a sort of sacrosanct person, inmune to
12. 642.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    (make cigarettes more addictive) strawman here. You can be hired to do the opposite of addictive.
13. 643.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    I have high desk setup, to the point my elbows don't float and don't force my shoulders go up. The position is really confortable and I also have the monitors positioned at the leve of my face. Very confortable.
14. 644.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    I'm using DuckDuckGo since a year and a half and I'm getting nice results, including old content and less spammy websites like Pinterest or other places.
15. 645.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    I dropped a beer in my 2017 model, and i screwed up all the spacebar, and the command and option keys in one side. They were really hard to use until some days ago they started working. The prior models were better for maintenance and resis
16. 646.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    That's not a drawback at all. First, you would replace those font-bold with font-italic (assuming you name the utilities like that) and problem solved. You don't need to change .font-bold and add font-style: italic; in the font-bo
17. 647.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    That means two things: you need extra utitilies to have different reds or, you don't mind to adjust the same red that will impact in the rest of the website. As a designer I do this all the time. If my design is complex to the point I
18. 648.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    Let me see this: .body--homepage .searchbox { color: red } but, you use .searchbox on other section and you want it green .body--article .searchbox { color: yellow } To me this sounds an akward usecase but you can do this with functiona
19. 649.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    That's the problem functional CSS solves: class naming doesn't relay on developer intervention, it's just a translation of the utility. Product-card is not an utility, that's why it's a problem to maintain such clas
20. 650.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    Give me an example of that. Would you mantain .display--block? how? .color--red?
21. 651.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    Anyone interested in a framework to produce functional CSS in SCSS/Sass, this is my project https://github.com/meerita/utilcss
22. 652.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    No it's not. You cannot do this in inline styles: <div class="md-display--none xl-display--block">…</div> It's a false premise to say this is "inline CSS". Inline styles are one subset of the e
23. 653.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    > To each their own, but I personally learned to hate this approach. In my experience, it leads to a CSS spaghetti full of overrides and `!important` just to get all the utility classes to play nicely across a site. And of course the ma
24. 654.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    > I think utility-first CSS has its benefits as well as it's drawbacks What drawbacks?
25. 655.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    I've wrote an extensive piece (p1: http://minid.net/2019/04/07/the-css-utilitarian-methodology/ ) about this too called "In Defense of Functional CSS" (p2: http://minid.net/
26. 656.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    A 1400 dollars phone that cannot compete with an 1000 iPhone/Samsung? Delusional.
27. 657.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    Consistency, good content over quantity. Good writing style and lots of fun too!
28. 658.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    I got the 2019 from my company. I have the 2017 no touchbar model.
29. 659.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    I'm using my 2017 Macbook Pro and I hardly use the early 2019. I never liked the touchbar.
30. 660.▲
    by meerita 7y ago

    Please, where did I misspelled?