Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
meejah
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
meejah
3y ago
Yes, the "setup" messages via the Mailbox Server will be over the internet to a third-party server. All the contents of these messages are end-to-end encrypted so you reveal which two IP addresses are communicating, but not the co
32.
▲
by
meejah
3y ago
It is compatible, you just have to configure the other client to use the same servers. For example, to use the "wormhole" Python CLI with Destiny, you can do this: wormhole --relay-url wss://mailbox.mw.leastauthority.com
33.
▲
by
meejah
3y ago
I would personally keep "pair programming" at the top of the list, this _really_ helps everyone learn. Even more importantly, it tightens the loop between "write code, review code, change code, merge it finally" since yo
34.
▲
by
meejah
5y ago
It sounds like you're suggesting that magic-wormhole only wishes to provide end-to-end encryption to "abnormal" people. I don't believe that's true and there already exist implementations of the open magic-wormhole
35.
▲
by
meejah
8y ago
I don't know the exact answer to that, but "not much" in comparison to the time to send the bytes over the network. The actual contents are encrypted using AES which often has built-in instructions on modern processors and is
36.
▲
by
meejah
8y ago
Sure, yes you could do that -- I mean, PrivateStorage is just shipping you a "real actual Tahoe client". The main feature you're getting is the managed storage-servers. So if you happened to "not completely trust" t
37.
▲
by
meejah
8y ago
In the PrivateStorage case the machines aren't "trusted" but they are all run by the service you're paying for -- so the incentive to keep them running properly is indeed there. For other kinds of Tahoe deployments, no t
38.
▲
by
meejah
8y ago
An expert could figure out how to get the PrivateStorage Tahoe client to use other storage servers, but yes in general it is "a managed service" and I don't think using your own storage-servers will be "a supported confi
39.
▲
by
meejah
8y ago
Tahoe-LAFS does "erasure coding" on the chunks of data. This increases the size of the data (adding redundancy) so that you can recover a file without recovering every single chunk. These parameters are decided client-side. In the
40.
▲
by
meejah
8y ago
Tahoe-LAFS by itself is probably not (you do have to configure and keep some Python-based daemon software running), but PrivateStorage is a managed service.
41.
▲
by
meejah
9y ago
I don't believe OnionShare uses txtorcon at all, actually. And I wrote txtorcon, not Micah ;) but they're both decent options for publishing depending on your use-cases.
42.
▲
by
meejah
9y ago
It is the PGP Word List: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PGP_Words
43.
▲
by
meejah
9y ago
The codes have a small number in front; these are the requests. So if the server did allow 65k requests, each one would be a different number. You can guess once per request. Yes, an attacker can denial-of-service by guessing once on all
44.
▲
by
meejah
9y ago
The attacker still just gets 1 guess per wormhole / send request. Each send-request / wormhole is its own separate thing.
45.
▲
by
meejah
9y ago
Any attacker only gets a single guess
46.
▲
by
meejah
11y ago
I think these types of studies are all going to be fatally flawed with a bunch of very-hard-to-untangle factors: since "40 hours" (or more) is the "expected norm" then if you're working less you've either fough
47.
▲
by
meejah
11y ago
I have, and it was more an attitude/cultural thing: the reviewee took any criticism very personally, and was hence super defensive and unlikely to change anything anyway. Honestly, I think it's actually really, really hard not t
48.
▲
by
meejah
12y ago
Yeah, the answer to "commercial mass-produced eggs waste resources" isn't "let's use mass-produced X instead!" ...it's more along the lines of what you suggest: preferring locally-produced eggs from smalle
49.
▲
by
meejah
12y ago
Do you ask to see the resumes of candidates?
50.
▲
by
meejah
12y ago
...and in fact, there's a popular use-case called "using memcached" that does have side-effects. That is, doing a GET on something absolutely changes the server "state" (in the sense that memcached might have a key
51.
▲
Control Tor from Python/Twisted: txtorcon
(meejah.ca)
1 points
by
meejah
12y ago
|
0 comments