me-vs-cat

8 ms·

91.
by me-vs-cat 1y ago
> I got what you're saying the first time, That wasn't me. Multiple people were taking the time to help you understand.
92.
by me-vs-cat 1y ago
> I feel like I'm talking to a toddler, sigh. Me too, but I'm done. Have fun!
93.
by me-vs-cat 1y ago
Have you ever used Acrobat? Not "Acrobat Reader", but regular Acrobat, the most popular PDF editor. It's from Adobe, and it definitely does not "resist" edits.
94.
by me-vs-cat 1y ago
> you can always just replace the appropriate object/text streams Or right-click and select Edit. Works in several PDF editors, on both text and image content.
95.
by me-vs-cat 1y ago
PDFs are not immutable.
96.
by me-vs-cat 1y ago
This makes more sense to me shrinking down instead of sizing up: "Hold a golf ball. Imagine you're looking at the Earth with its own golf balls. Those smaller golf balls are the same size as atoms in the original golf ball you&
97.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
How can that benchmark be useful unless real people are actually eating some lettuce covered in milkshake? Wait, ARE people eating that? Have I been out of the game too long?
98.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
Backwards compatibility works differently there, and legalese has not exactly evolved naturally.
99.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
The comment to which I replied and gave this recommendation mentioned Android and did not mention Apple.
100.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
https://tasks.org/ meets every requirement you list. With one exception, as I don't know what you mean by "Visible in my taskbar and stuff like need". I don't have a taskbar on my phone, but if you mean
101.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
Thank you for pointing me to that. Still, strong disagree it applies here, so I'll counter with a quote from the second part of a three piece opus, in a photoplay long ago and far away: Do or do not. There is no try.
102.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
> It won't work, but at least you could say you tried to apply the law. That's worth something. What is that worth?
103.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
The need for a system doesn't imply that your proposal is better than the status quo. > Better a few people benefit undeservedly than many who deserve and need the benefits go hungry. Agreed. Now consider that regulations exclude p
104.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
You having said so previously has no impact on this belief: > A grocery store would be rare indeed that could afford to pay their lowest-skilled, lowest-tenured cashier at $24/hr. Surely society can come up with a better answer than
105.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
Sure, we can approach from that angle, instead of the just-graduated-high-school angle. I did not talk about paying cashiers at different rates. I addressed the single minimum rate from the earlier comment, where a household's single
106.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
"Doctor, I need you to declare me disabled or else I'll lose my job when I turn 21. I need this job, and I don't know if I can find another one at the 21yo minimum wage." I really want to like what you're saying, b
107.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
Despite agreeing with the rest, should the kid who graduated high school 2 months ago (1) earn as a grocery cashier to support a family of four, including medical and education, (2) should they not work / not be employable, or (3) is t
108.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
How many of the people providing the funding are interested in science, and how many simply want an outcome which furthers their ends?
109.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
Nobel candidates cannot be deceased.
110.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
> But the solution is to learn more about the thing so it stops triggering a reptilian response. That takes time or may never happen, even in the best cases. In the meantime, clenched teeth sounds exactly like what they should do, as
111.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
Like you, I find those terms awkward, at best. I refuse to use them. Yet, "what should have been produced" is no better. Everytime I hear it, from you and anyone else, it sounds like numbskulls all too pleased at themselves for w
112.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
What do you expect for people born without the capability to produce gametes?
113.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
The author contacted the current and former vendors, got a flippant answer, asked again, and was ghosted for two weeks. I see here a desire for a random person to accept a staggering amount of your personal responsibility. Anyone under lon
114.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
> I'm sure there is an official way to put something out of stock and restock it again And I wouldn't be surprised if there is no official way.
115.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
Simply just basically don't.
116.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
I could tell you more words that are only ever spoken, but not here.
117.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
Might be security/secrecy, but sounds like someone in upper ranks got a bad taste from one bad apple. At first I read the earlier "work someone else" to mean get a different job, but now that reads like "pick another bu
118.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
I have a non-default option on for zsh, which is incredibly useful interactively. (Bash also has this option, but I haven't enabled it.) Normally, ls doesn't expand globs. Why did you say to try "touch a; ls -?"? What am
119.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
> Try this: touch a; ls -? I don't see it. What are you trying to show with 'a' instead of '-l'? Why would a file named 'a' interact with a glob like '-?'? $ touch a $ ls -? zs
120.
by me-vs-cat 2y ago
I am unable to fit that example in this prior description: "if I append to the source file, I can't break previously correct code above the insertion point". Your foo() example above has code which has been changed, rather th

More ›