mdp2021

5 ms·

61.
by mdp2021 28d ago
> already happened And it will only worsen with impeded access to material for cultivation. The failures in education are of paramount importance and the proper orientation from people capable of saying "no access to culture, for
62.
by mdp2021 28d ago
> The European Commission is set to unveil an EU Kids Act proposal restricting minors' access to platforms such as Instagram, TikTok and YouTube YouTube is the video museum and is crucial for formation. Badly maintained, but it is
63.
Leak: EU Commission to pitch social media restrictions for under-15s(euronews.com)
18 points by mdp2021 28d ago|19 comments
64.
by mdp2021 29d ago
> the irony of this sentence Unthinkable magnitude, I meant. > no imminent danger or threat Current technologies are already a danger as agents - they can already do damage - and an unfinished product that cannot be aborted at thi
65.
by mdp2021 29d ago
I know well enough; I'd be surprised if they know more than I do. And I also know very heavily that we cannot stall into societies of empowered deficient humans.
66.
by mdp2021 29d ago
> disappointed One of the most extreme understatement in history.
67.
by mdp2021 29d ago
It means that not all risks justify stall.
68.
by mdp2021 29d ago
> we agree We don't. The need for Intelligence to fill the scarcity is unthinkable. The urgency is the highest, especially ever since simil-intelligence (LLMs) was implemented. To research Intelligence "safely" you simpl
69.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
Obviously that is one of the needs. It clashes with zero-sum game mentalities - and they are part of what needs to be overcome (further questions for the superconsultants).
70.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
> the profound stupidity of the humans Which poses the need for getting Intelligence somewhere. > connecting it to important infrastructure Are you aware that agentic NNs can try and do it on their own quirk? Agentic NNs are the b
71.
Ten years of AI reporting ("60 Minutes" Marathon) [video](youtube.com)
1 points by mdp2021 1mo ago|1 comments
72.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
Contents: > Hands Off the Wheel (Automated Driving) - October 2015 // The Oracle of AI (Kai-Fu Lee) - January 2019 // Kings of the Road (Automated Trucking) - March 2020 // Deepfakes - July 2022 /&#x2F
73.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
> access to enough legal services A large part of the world (possibly Nations-transversal, in different amounts) does not work within the boundaries of legal guarantees. Wealth is not an effective enough protection.
74.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
(I believe the poster meant: well past tattoos, the next superstep in the "body modification for self expression" subcultural era.)
75.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
How can you interpret «developers and researchers working on advanced AI» as «people who are AI researchers by trade or specialisation, or who conducted AI research in the past» - nobody in their sanity would understand that. Or are you com
76.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
What you wrote makes no sense in the chain: "If you accepted that C were a crime than C should be sanctioned" - this is not the point. Who argues against that non-matter? You stated that the submission did not represent the facts
77.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
LLMs are either a toy if they are not reliable and a mockery if not actually intelligent; to make them intelligent, to achieve Intelligence, is what Sanders proposed to make illegal. What we are striving to do is to achieve Intelligence - i
78.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
Seems fixed now: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=grapheneos
79.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
Again and again the scum reacts but does not reply.
80.
As antibiotic resistance grows, researchers turn to copper to fight infections(phys.org)
3 points by mdp2021 1mo ago|0 comments
81.
Intel Linux NPU Driver Only Now Officially Supports Ubuntu 26.04 LTS(phoronix.com)
4 points by mdp2021 1mo ago|0 comments
82.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
Explain «Banning Artificial Superintelligence so no person or entity [etc.]». Or you think that «Advanced AI development» does not imply attempting the achievement of Intelligence?
83.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
> They might as well rename it to «When in trouble, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout» ~~ Walt Disney - Donald Duck
84.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
> editorialised title By whom? It's the actual title of the WSJ article. > to drum up hype before IPO valuations Check the article: it is just a shallow summary of the week - Navier-Stokes plus doomerist's resignations.
85.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
He named himself "autophagian" - it just confirms his story. -- Edit: who is that https://ca.linkedin.com/in/analeticiaibarra who signed the disgraced "cindyllm" account? The saboteur even signed it
86.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
> The law proposal bans research on ASI Which is exactly the same as the submission's post, obvious interpretations of "AI" aside: how can we implement Intelligence without enabling superintelligence at the same time?! A
87.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
> If everybody agree[d] that AI is a threat to humanity Which would be either very difficult or very ironical, given that realizing that humanity is a threat to humanity precedes that.
88.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
And you would use an LLM to perform actions when it is not a superintelligence?! We want morons to be under much more than restraining order distance.
89.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
The USA should finally revise their system and create more parties. It is absurd that power be left bouncing on the rhythm of "never this, we'll pick whatever that".
90.
by mdp2021 1mo ago
Nuclear proliferation is not proper in context. The bill in question in the submission is not about preserving a status quo, it is about banning the technology. A ban on technology results in underground research, migration of intellectuals

More ›