Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mdekkers
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
661.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
So you are sitting in interviews but you don't know if the candidate has a PhD before you go in? Sounds like that is your fault. Of course I know what qualifications they have. I don't know what "fault" you are talking
662.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
I guess Michael Faraday, Thomas Edison, Charles Darwin, Gregor Mendel, TH Huxley and James Prescott Joule weren't scientists then. And Richard Leakey isn't one either. As far as I understand, they were not data scientists in the
663.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Because having a phd makes you knowledgeable about data and statistics... It does if you have a Phd in a data science related field.
664.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Is that still white hat? I think if you are not specifically asked to do it, it isn't white hat, and I think (but am not 100% sure) the law is like that. I don't know what hat it is, but white it isn't.
665.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Awesomely entertaining (hah!) read. Very interesting, thanks. Also, welcome to every no-fly list on the planet. If you are going to find that you are increasingly seeing more scrutiny, this is why.
666.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Indeed. Call me a snob, but I am sitting in 2 to 3 interviews weekly at the moment (looking for a big data specialist) and everyone is a "Data Scientist": me : You state on your CV that you are a data scientist Candidate : Yes
667.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Indeed. I have seen several teams with a bunch of (self-styled) "10x" devs, and found that the productivity and quality of the team decreases in direct proportion to the amount of "10x" devs on the team. I shun "roc
668.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
and if someone told me Apple had spent $1.5bn and 6 years on a top secret project I'd be hugely excited about what it might look like. Apple have a battle-proven history of being able to execute and deliver. Magic Leap doesn't.
669.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8J5BWL8oJY&t=4m30s* What the actual fuck did I just watch?
670.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Everytime I read something about Magic Leap it is "they may or may not use this tech for this product they may or may not be working on".
671.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
it introduces an awful lot of negativity. So true - I used to start my day reading news. No more, and my days are happier for it. Most of it is shit you cannot influence anyway.
672.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
because we are always fucking working. I know, I was half of a computer engineering couple.
673.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
The question you need to answer is can you sustain this for the remainder of your lifespan. He doesn't have to, as he is now at his target weight. He only needs to maintain his current body weight, which isn't the same thing.
674.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
I stopped reading after about 30 seconds. "Ben Regenspan" - the author of the piece didn't get the memo that the <blink> tag was removed from the HTML spec because it annoyed the hell out of every single person on plan
675.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Having been in these kinds of negotiations many times over the 15 years I've been in business, and having never been sued nor ever had a deal go seriously wrong, the dad's advice seems perfectly sound. That is like saying "
676.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Step 1. Don't keep your tomatoes in the fridge.
677.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
They are called the same in Holland :)
678.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Reading the wiki article this whole things comes across as some vague handwaving ending with "and you are all under arrest, all your coins are belong to us". Has a bit of an air of "you won't do as we tell you? watch how
679.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
So the amazing UX comes down to a clever charging case, and comfy in-ear experience? Point 1 is a statement about your other headphones, not the airpods; Point 4 is ambiguous. That isn't really enough for me to say "lets ditch wir
680.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
two people have downvoted me without explanation Sadly, that is the new normal for HN (and, I'll be downvoted for saying something like this)
681.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
If there is such overwhelming evidence that it's a foregone conclusion, then I wonder why they haven't charged and convicted the man already. Why do they need any cooperation at all? It isn't about childporn, or whatever th
682.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
there are hashes of known child pornography content on the drive On an encrypted drive? Sounds like bullshit to me.
683.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
It's appalling how so many nutrition experts have gotten this so wrong for so long. Follow the money. Farming subsidies, etc.
684.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
the amazing UX of Airpods Genuinely curious. What is so amazing about it?
685.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
....points? They are giving away POINTS?!? Just like that, I can HAVE MORE POINTS?!?! What can I buy with those points?
686.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Entrepreneur has 140 pairs of sweatpants and T-shirts This is listed right under the headline - is this really a key takeaway for the article??
687.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Somehow adding a theme adds 15% to my productivity? Bollocks. I laughed at the "I travel inside my directories a lot" - midnight commander will blow this guys mind. I installed midnight commander, and increased my productivity 132
688.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Processwire.com is the new PHP Lego. ...because? That is a pretty strong statement, and some reasoning for that would be useful. As it is, your comment is spammy and out of place.
689.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
google still hasn't learnt how to do support/communicate with their paying customers You are confusing "don't know how" with "absolutely not incentivised to spend money on this"
690.
▲
by
mdekkers
9y ago
Banks either are or are not "moral" gatekeepers. They don't get to have it both ways. It isn't a morality issue (banks don't care) it is a risk issue.
More ›