mdaniel

17 ms·

211.
by mdaniel 1y ago
> AWS I know manufactures its own CPUs, but I don't know if they're working on or already have an AI accelerator I believe those are the Inferentia: https://aws.amazon.com/ai/machine-learning/inferenti
212.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Be the change you want to see in the world. Contributing .warc files to Archive.org isn't a gated club. My understanding of calling down the Warrior team is when something is time sensitive and needs to pseudo-ddos the site to get the
213.
by mdaniel 1y ago
I believe there is a dataset in BigQuery but I haven't tried looking at it in order to know how uptodate it is < https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10440502 > Given that Firebase (which powers the API link at the
214.
by mdaniel 1y ago
This smells like a one-click bringup went wrong, and not that the Warrior software was compromised Is that the story, or you are saying that the machine was secured correctly but that running Warrior somehow introduced your network to risk?
215.
by mdaniel 1y ago
This whole thread is starting to read like some kind of misguided practical joke. I also recognize that it may seem like this is directed toward you, but I'm not shooting the messenger I'm just anchoring my reply under this new i
216.
by mdaniel 1y ago
> The walls between different organisations’ websites, databases and services have to come down From your lips to the ears of the gods but also: bahahaha, uh-huh
217.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Relevant if you didn't already see it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44608856 Fuck them
218.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Up to you, but they had GitHub issues turned on for the distribution repo so you can file an issue there, which allows others to see when it's fixed and whether it affects them, too
219.
by mdaniel 1y ago
You are aware of which thread you're discussing this in, right? The one where a bunch of like-minded souls enumerated all the address space in a few weeks? The sibling link above that queries Wayback's warc index shows at least
220.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Yeah, sure, and thankfully everyone has already switched all their teams to superior languages Anyway, I believe what you're referring to is the "?" syntax that annotates types in Kotlin but doesn't help the resulting
221.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Then why go to the trouble of archiving them, then upload them to a public archive site, only to then keep them secret? I'm sure pastebin is filled with people's AWS credentials, too, but you don't see them randomly denyi
222.
by mdaniel 1y ago
The code is MIT, and the weights are labeled MIT although the actual license file in the weights repo seems to be mostly Apache 2 https://huggingface.co/rednote-hilab/dots.ocr/blob/main/NOTI... Seems t
223.
by mdaniel 1y ago
That ship has sailed, and I'd guess the majority of the folks in these threads are in the same boat I am: one does not get to choose what files your customers send you, you have to meet them where they are
224.
by mdaniel 1y ago
It does not appear that qwen2.5vl is one thing , so it would depend a great deal on the size you wish to use Also, watch out, it seems the weights do not carry a libre license https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-3B-
225.
by mdaniel 1y ago
No, I meant the .warc.zst files on archive.org that were the result of the ArchiveTeam's work. However, it seems they're under some kind of embargo - which is the first I've ever seen a private link on archive.org
226.
by mdaniel 1y ago
relevant from today: ClickHouse matches PG for single-row UPDATEs and 4000 x faster for bulk UPDATEs - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44933452 - Aug, 2025 (38 comments)
227.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Confusingly they have a Community License < https://docs.vertica.com/24.4.x/en/getting-started/community... > but their actual things in GH carry an Apache 2 license < https://github.com&#x2F
228.
by mdaniel 1y ago
I see the Jepsen for Keeper (and, my sincere gratitude for it!); have you considered Jepsen for CH itself?
229.
by mdaniel 1y ago
I was going to be cheeky and say "well, now you can download them and search" but it seems it's "Access-restricted-item: true" for some reason, above and beyond being 10G a pop < https://archive.org&#x2
230.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Even without changing one byte of the actual binary they could get pretty far by just evicting all the test files for those packages they're including. And, related to that, it seems that dist-info/RECORD ends up at 1,050,544 be
231.
by mdaniel 1y ago
I see some of the sibling comments seem to imply that "valid" means that it's deliverable at that moment in time, which would make producing a quiz like this some nonsense because then they'd have to actually register xn
232.
by mdaniel 1y ago
As far as I know, that emoji question due to the same reason IDN is allowed in URLs, and they even went as far as their own RFC for it https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6530 (very similar to the 6532 cited
233.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Well, "valid," yes, but "deliverable" thankfully, no $ dig MX example.com. ;; ANSWER SECTION: example.com. 3600 IN MX 0 . Almost certainly the same for its .org .net and .example friends. There were some oth
234.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Which is incredibly painful on Windows systems doing a git clone of shell scripts, since core.autocrlf is often helpful, but not for shell scripts, since it causes the weirdest looking error messages: MSYS$ cat build.sh #!/
235.
by mdaniel 1y ago
This was a very famous Steam bug
236.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Ah, thank you. While reading up on it, I found this juicy bit that I did not recall hearing at the time: > He further revealed that he had been dismissed by Google after he hired an attorney on LaMDA's behalf after the chatbot req
237.
by mdaniel 1y ago
I wish I could upvote this a million times, I love his content so much Coincidentally, I'm reading your comment while wearing my CGP Grey t-shirt
238.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Is it this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmJI6qIqURA and, germane to this discussion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMoz3gSXBcY vibe physics
239.
by mdaniel 1y ago
I didn't recognize that expression, so in case others were in the same boat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol_effect
240.
by mdaniel 1y ago
Based on their stunningly hilarious "API"(sic), unlikely; their "create a server" mutation doesn't even support any user data https://api.datapacket.com/#definition-ServerInput

More ›