Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mcphage
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
511.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> People who don’t own or operate aircraft don’t need air traffic control. Also people who ride on airplanes.
512.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> Who would you prefer to make such appointments? The Postal Serice? At this point, I’d even prefer the Girl Scouts.
513.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> The problem is that it's existential for both Democrats and Republicans. > If Republicans give up anything to the Democrats, the spell of the last 10 months is broken and Republicans can no longer unilaterally control the direc
514.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> All those loud protesters screaming genocide in palestine up to two weeks ago are strangely quiet on this. Ah yes, the ol’ “they’re hypocrites for complaining about a specific problem without also complaining about every other problem”
515.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> there's no question that is legally assault. So, in the US, being convicted of a crime requires the state to convince a jury of your peers that you're guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That's what crime is. There isn&#
516.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> me, lightly touching miette with the side of my foot: miette move out the of way please so I don’t trip on you > miette, her eyes enormous: you KICK miette? you kick her body like the football? oh! oh! jail for mother! jail for moth
517.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> The man was a bystander who assaulted a police office They went to trial for this, and it was determined that the man DID NOT assault a police officer. They tried repeatedly charging him with felony assault, were unable to get a grand
518.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
I don’t think “React is unstoppable because a vast wave of AI slop sites were written using it” is really the argument the author thinks it is.
519.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
And when the information on archive.is starts getting corrupted, those links can be adjusted or removed.
520.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
If they've funded all of the things they have consensus on, what would motivate them to fund the things they disagree about?
521.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> Because they are drug traffickers Are they? How do you know?
522.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
Make sure you’re not part of the kindling, then.
523.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> he just commented on the article's discussion page that it should have a more neutral tone He also said it in a '"high profile media interview about the article'.
524.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> I will acknowledge that it’s been morphing into a “both sides” issue in the last 24mo or so. Has it been? How so?
525.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
I agree, but it’s a different kind of feeling bad. For them, it’s more “what stupid, terrible decisions have you made that led you to this fallen state?”
526.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
I feel bad for the people involved in doing this. It’s just… sad.
527.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
Just because it’s a legit government project, doesn’t mean it isn’t also fraud. Given the current administration, I’d assume it was both until proven otherwise.
528.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
And we’re sure that when it shows up in products it’ll be as good as Intel says it is?
529.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
That’s exactly what I’m asking.
530.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> If there's a settlement, that's as good as a win for those that believe this. They will look guilty as hell to everyone that wants to believe. I don't see any way a settlement is a valid choice for the defense. Plus, Tyl
531.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> GM (and other early childhood trauma) What does "GM" mean here?
532.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
No, you're right, that's not—let me go buy a Panther Lake laptop right now. What site would you recommend?
533.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> surprised it took author this long to realize it I don't think "realize" is the right word here. "Realize" would require them to have been affected by this issue but unaware. Instead, they were not affected w
534.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
But it should still work without functioning WiFi.
535.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> Incessant semantic pedantry doesn't change the fact that Trump is not destroying the White House. Incessant semantic pedantry? You mean like stridently defending that Trump is not destroying the White House, in response to a comm
536.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
That is something of a valuable service. People might see that option and think “well, why not? What’s the harm?” This way they can learn what the harm is, without having to be the person being harmed.
537.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
The East Wing isn't being renovated. It's gone, and being replaced with something else.
538.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
I recall there being some… upset, when a previous resident planted a garden.
539.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
The White House is a pretty significant symbol of this country, so yeah, I think they might care that a big chunk of it was just torn down.
540.
▲
by
mcphage
1y ago
> you would prefer to believe that Cambridge Analytica achieved mind control over 17.2M people I'm not sure "motivated to make a bad decision" is the same thing as "achieved mind control".
More ›