maydup-nem

12 ms·

91.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
general usability? emacs is as usable as you make it. friendliness? emacs doesn't need friends, it needs power users.
92.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
I do : )
93.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
it's amazing what people will do to avoid using emacs
94.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
that amjad guy sounds like an entitled piece of shit who thinks he knows what innovation is and that he has anything to with it. lold.
95.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
> The benefit of easy AST manipulation just doesn't seem worth it when the cost is a very heavy and verbose syntax. Wat. "Very heavy and verbose syntax"? Are you even sure you are talking about lisp?
96.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
> gc you could maybe try the two lines here (set the megabyte count, the third number, to your own liking): https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/34342/is-there-any...
97.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
No, I wasn't angry, even though I can see how that could come off as such. But I do feel like it's yet another highly-upvoted time waster with no substance to it on the front page.
98.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
Why, is it so fucking hard to place 101 points to be able to pinpoint where exactly you stand (and then show a graph of responses), instead of this beaten-to-death-horse more/less than average trickery (probably done solely for some BS
99.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
A CEO overpromised. AI underdelivered. Big fucking news.
100.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
This view is forced and implicitly claims there are some actual trends going on with some handpicked examples, and even then they're quite false. Give me a break. I think this complex/simple notion is black-and-white kind of wrong
101.
by maydup-nem 5y ago
The first approach creates a list, which means cheap insert/delete. But it's not a fair comparison, as the second approach doesn't let you do that. For that, you would need to allocate an array of objects in the first approac