Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
matz1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
361.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Yes I do have couple of nurse friend and doctor, they all thought lockdown measure is way overkill and all this has been greatly overblown. Not to mention the excessive ppe measure/protocol they now have to adopt, its only made their j
362.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
What do you mean by "correct" ? It is correct if you assume the hard lockdown doesn't have any downside. The lockdown is not necessary in the first place. In most places, hospital are not overloaded. Even in the event of over
363.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
For me its the stance for Lockdown/restriction - seems to me blue state is more eager to lockdown.
364.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
To each their own, some people don't find it a problem, some do. You can't assume everyone work the same way.
365.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
It at least show that it possible to increase capacity if needed. The issue with the way case number calculated is, vast majority of the people are either asymptomatic or only have mild symptoms. How do you figure there will not be enough i
366.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Its interesting that some people worry about long term side effect of vaccine but not worry about long term side effect of lockdown. Vaccine is good but my biggest worry is if the same kind of virus happen again, it will become justificatio
367.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/... https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:/...
368.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
There are plenty of ICU nurses looking for employment all over the country. And ironically due to lockdown, lots of nurses being laid off/furloughed. And there is field hospitals for covid being dismantled because there is lack of use.
369.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Yes they can, its logistics issue.
370.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Yes of course there will always non zero risk of dying from covid. Even if covid never happen there is always small chance of dying from something, I never deny that. What about the secondary effect of banning indoor wedding?
371.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
By that logic I can also says mask cannot be taken seriously on the societal level, unless you are being paranoid.
372.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>So, first let the harm happen, then when we're sure there's harm, then restrict? Regardless what you choose, there will be harm. Both is harmful. Covid is harmful. Lockdown is harmful. Its matter of choosing the less harmful o
373.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Except in most places the hospital are not overflowing, even in the event of hospital overflowing, the measure should be to increase capacity, re-distribute to other hospital, don't admit people who only have mild symptoms. In fact, I
374.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>we still do not learn much about long-term consequences of COVID infection among less vulnerable population Then we need to first learn about it before implementing measure that is harmful such as lockdown. Somehow lockdown doesn't
375.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
I acknowledge maybe it isn't harm for you but you can't say its not harm for me or other people.
376.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Well, because I can only speak for myself. The impact goes both ways, preventing people to go to indoor weeding has impact on other people too.
377.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Even without mask, we still could go about our lives as nothing happen.
378.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>Does not going to indoor weddings decrease your chance of infection? Yes, obviously Sure,but at the same not having indoor weeding also has its disadvantages. The question is, is it worth the risk of going to indoor weeding? At least fo
379.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
I think 3x as expensive is still worth it for long haul flight. One business seat space equal to about 3 economy seat space and you also got lounge access and priority checkin.
380.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Depends on how they define 'confirmed case'. It plausible if their definition of confirmed cases means actually sick with moderate symptom.
381.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Well, not everyone, I wouldn't redicule or ostracize my social circle for not tipping.
382.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>then you are making a purely selfish act to benefit from the unjust system So what is the downside for that individual?
383.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
The following itself is not the issue right?
384.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
sure its depends on how easy for them to find other candidate.
385.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Moral is subjective. There also many people that their is moral obligation to not put honest effort or pay fair wages.
386.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
That depends on how valuable you are to them. If you can help them let say generate $10M income (while live in Monaco) then its no brainer to pay you $1M
387.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
That's depends on the negotiation you have with your employer.
388.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>So what do you think of intensive care bed running out and people dying at the hospital entrances like in Italy? It is bad, I didn't say nothing should be done about it. Some that can be done: Increasing intensive care capacity, re
389.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
I oppose lockdown/shut down, doesn't mean I don't believe that covid is real, nor I believe there is 0 risk from covid but simply I'm comparing the cost/risk of lockdown vs cost/risk of covid. I acknowledge th
390.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>Similarly, not everyone likes having to use what is traditionally called a GUI Thats why, not everyone prefer CLI, if you are the one who learn better with GUI then resisting GUI's is not a good idea
More ›