mattsan

8 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by mattsan 3y ago

   Yeah I would think that downstream users would just expect a function that only takes in the params that they specify - leave it up to the API user to just make a closure on the spot.
2. 62.▲
   by mattsan 3y ago

   I'm questioning this advantage: > Improved type safety: Currying can help improve type safety by ensuring that each curried function takes exactly one argument of the correct type. This can help catch errors at compile time and make
3. 63.▲
   by mattsan 3y ago

   I would definitely keep an eye out for Fedora Asahi Linux
4. 64.▲
   by mattsan 3y ago

   Might be worth exploring linear ASTs with relative pointers which size could be truncated along with N-byte alignments
5. 65.▲
   by mattsan 3y ago

   Could it be CGNAT?
6. 66.▲
   Ask HN: Website for optimising FP arithmetic with precision loss bounds

   1 points by mattsan 3y ago|0 comments
7. 67.▲
   by mattsan 3y ago

   Yeah but Cloudflare integrates really nicely with Rust compared to other languages that compile to WASM, e.g. their service bindings
8. 68.▲
   by mattsan 3y ago

   Well it avoids client side state and improves load times. I personally think the main benefit of htmx is fetching components individually from the server and so JS on Edge makes sense.
9. 69.▲
   by mattsan 3y ago

   They also support Rust directly with WASM (I believe no JS loader, not too sure though). Would be interesting to see Rust on edge with htmx.
10. 70.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Absolutely incredible. I was working on something like this a few weeks ago but never got round to finishing. A huge source of inspiration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpzowDDJj24
11. 71.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Yeah, I assume that's the only frameworks/presets they currently have for their quick deploy/auto scalability integration
12. 72.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Yep, comes from Latin! [1] [1]: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/axilla#:~:text=Th... .
13. 73.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Same
14. 74.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    I've never used or seen cheques been used. Anecdotal though.
15. 75.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Ah. Faster Payments in the UK are free.
16. 76.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Damn. We only have to pay fees to the EU after brexit (and I assume internationally too. edit: I've never transferred internationally).
17. 77.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    I had to read this twice - is it really not like in the UK? Is this the first US implementation of "Faster Payments"? Sure people in the UK sometimes use PayPal, Revolut, but most of the time its always just a friend gives (and yo
18. 78.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    This is so genius - if I ever become a teacher I'm doing this.
19. 79.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Yep, confirmation bias. Luckily helped with peer review!
20. 80.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Plot twist would be that it is Piano actually paying the bills
21. 81.▲
    Ask HN: When will NASA team up with Boston Dynamics to get a space robot dog?

    1 points by mattsan 3y ago|5 comments
22. 82.▲
    Ask HN: Has anyone experimented with dynamic NN layer connections?

    2 points by mattsan 3y ago|2 comments
23. 83.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Yep, hence why I mentioned this would only be a problem if they ever want to do business with the EU
24. 84.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    No universities in the UK look at these things, the only thing they look at is if you've been part of programs that look at socioeconomic factors (e.g. if you're the first in your family to go to university, parents salary, you li
25. 85.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    I'm sure there are still some people willing to report the websites to EU commission, it's a guaranteed fine (less so a paycheque, I have no clue if the company has to comply with paying it (unless later on they want to expand to
26. 86.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    I think this will be the eventual goal with a simple syntax.
27. 87.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Oops I worded it badly! I meant take some theory from Make and modify it to be more ergonomic before adding it into Piper. A la rethinking it all with new knowledge I gain.
28. 88.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Thank you! Re. a), b); I will probably add a "spread operator" syntax or something for collections. Maybe different symbols for the different types. Once I start prototyping I'll choose whatever is the least burden on the use
29. 89.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Great resources, thank you! I think I came across some of these ideas before and it might have been as simple as me resenting the syntax. I'll touch up on my `make` knowledge and try to make Piper more ergonomic!
30. 90.▲
    by mattsan 3y ago

    Very good point! For my next amendment(s) to the idea, I will be attempting to think of a simple way to do M-N. It should naturally also cover 1-1, 1-N, and N-1.