matthewwarren

40 ms·

1. 451.▲
   On the Fence with Dependencies(shipilev.net)

   1 points by matthewwarren 12y ago|0 comments
2. 452.▲
   by matthewwarren 12y ago

   Thanks for taking the time to read it!
3. 453.▲
   by matthewwarren 12y ago

   Yeah pretty much, you can use fixed [1], to access managed memory in an unsafe way. The GC then treats this as pinned and won't relocate it. [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/f58wzh21(v=vs.71).as...
4. 454.▲
   by matthewwarren 12y ago

   Yeah I keep meaning to dig into PerfView a bit more, I've only scratched the surface of it. BTW I really like the Perf stuff in Roslyn, I wrote 2 posts about it, in case your interested? Although as you worked on it, it won't be a
5. 455.▲
   by matthewwarren 12y ago

   Thanks for the link, that's nice to know. You get some of that functionality in .NET, with the new GC mode SustainedLowLatency [1]. But it doesn't guarantee no GC, it just tried to avoid it. > Enables garbage collection that tr
6. 456.▲
   by matthewwarren 12y ago

   Yeah there definitely comes a point with .NET/Java where, to get very high performance, you are fighting the language/runtime. The general argument is that you are still more productive by writing 90% or 95% of you app in a manage
7. 457.▲
   Measuring the Impact of the .NET Garbage Collector(mattwarren.org)

   78 points by matthewwarren 12y ago|18 comments