mathisfun123

6 ms·

91.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
None of these things are true except the ClangIR thing
92.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> GPUs aren't really SIMD, they're SIMT (single instruction multiple thread) False. If they were threads they'd have their own PC. They do not - only the warp has a PC. > You just write plain scalar code and the hardwar
93.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
32 wide - only AMD has a 64 wide mode
94.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> you and yours whining after you lose another election Lol my man have you looked at the polls lately https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-sil... Haha
95.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
This is only a product for anti-social nerds. Most people will not pay a premium for this (this isn't waymo's product). Edit: lots of people commenting on here how they're normie and they would still prefer waymo. Read what I
96.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> I... really question the rationale here. occam's razor...
97.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> Calling it a "trust" is just the weasel words. I don't care what you think - this isn't a creative writing exercise. Trust is the technical term describing the legal framework for much of the land in the United St
98.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
find any econ related post on hn et voila
99.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
random capitalization... is this trump's hn alt lol?
100.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> Citizens most certainly do own the country.. To the extent that the land claimed as part of the United States belongs to and is controlled by the United States, it belongs to the people. Citizens are the beneficiaries of a trust. The l
101.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> These people feel as if they are (in part, collective) owners of the country But they don't in absolutely any sense (legal, moral, philosophical) own the country. And especially they do not "own" the culture (because tha
102.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
You realize that what you're commenting on (playing devil's advocate) is strongly encouraged by this site right? People are constantly "steel manning" stupid shit like this here. It's almost a sport.
103.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
Otherwise known as the "no shit Sherlock" principle
104.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
Do you understand what you're saying? > Human "translation" is one thing No it's not since "human translation" is literally all we had until about a year ago. You should read the case again because it doesn&
105.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
you can copyright a specific implementation but that doesn't necessarily grant a patent on the "algorithm". so unless darling is patented then a translation of the "algorithms" in darling is legal. to wit: that&#x27
106.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
indeed
107.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
brother i'm trying to tell you that the guy you're asking to be clearer is being vague because he's employing a shibboleth - a "wink wink i'm an og and you can only access me via the secret handshake at our club mee
108.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibboleth
109.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> Uses MLIR, XLA does not. https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aopenxla%2Fxla+mlir&type=c... > 1.5k files you're behind the times. XLA moved over probably ~2 years ago - "Captain Awesome" eventually r
110.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> do you think you are clever for being skeptical about LLMs brother like 3 people have pointed out what they're skeptcal of is cost not LLMs - at this point you're willfully misconstruing what people are saying to you just t
111.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
this is what almost every hn post is: lowbrow reflexive/reactionary responses. it's been like this for years. try to call it out and you'll be censured by dang or one of the other police officers for being "uncharitable&
112.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> If OpenAI solves the millenial problems, my skepticism will only be restricted to the correctness of proof. Not that it was "marketing" haha Company X does not make money from proving theorems but does make money from sel
113.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
you cannot be serious
114.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
I don't disagree with you but there's no need for exaggeration; ain't no high school student writing this: > In particular, proofs for special graph classes, constructions of cycle covers with some edges covered other than
115.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> I used to sit alone for 30-40 minutes, 100's of meters below ground, in absolute darkness, absolute silence, no life around do you happen to be the narrator of notes from the underground ?
116.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> now good enough to cause confusion and speculation since when is "confusion and speculation" an indicator of quality/goodness?
117.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> Printing presses are about exact duplication of writing. maybe LLMs are seen to write as well as humans because most humans have poor reading comprehension skills? to wit: OP is using an analogy to make their point, where the compone
118.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
since when is "confusion and speculation" an indicator of quality/goodness? if I ran around naked in traffic it would also cause confusion and speculation.
119.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
> There’s already a 3-4 year advanced degree What do these words mean to you? To me they imply the degree is intended to last 3-4 years. The English is very clear here.
120.
by mathisfun123 2mo ago
What percentage of all MS awarded would you wager are intended to be 3-4 years?

More ›