mateuszf

48 ms·

481.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Maybe the fact that Java developers expect "typical" object model in JavaScript which doesn't exist, and JavaScript developers can use lot of their constructs in Java just fine (with the exception of functions which are not v
482.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Usually said by Java developer not understanding JavaScript.
483.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Then it will be either not the same codebase as for webapp (having one is I suppose the most common reason for using web technology on desktop) or will require plugins.
484.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Filesystems users (developers) already assume that renames are fast. Changing the mode now would mean that some of the applications would seem like blocked or could behave strangely. S3 users already know and should handle that.
485.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Yes, it is. You can also get a version without "enterprise" features for free (called "Community Edition")
486.
by mateuszf 12y ago
People being stabbed in dark alleys is not a good argument for banning knives.
487.
by mateuszf 12y ago
This is very informative, thank you.
488.
by mateuszf 12y ago
> Many (probably most?) of them don't, but I don't know that it has much to do with the syntax. It has to do with the syntax. Working Lisp "plugins" is very simple because all the code is represented as plain datastru
489.
by mateuszf 12y ago
VirtualBox, but you will still need to buy Windows with license.
490.
by mateuszf 12y ago
There were so many technical proponents of systemd among distributions that it's now used by most of distros.
491.
by mateuszf 12y ago
And it's the exact reason why unification through systemd makes sense.
492.
by mateuszf 12y ago
It still is about choice. If you want you can fork Debian any time.
493.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Every language has good and bad parts.
494.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Chosen name "src" is quite unfortunate, as it will be a src of confusion.
495.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Guessing so that installation process is portable and isolated from original host.
496.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Thanks. But that is totally compatible with what I said. Java lambdas were well thought out, doing MVP style development would highly likely blow it.
497.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Also doesn't work for me in regular Firefox 33.0.3 (OSX).
498.
by mateuszf 12y ago
MVP and 100% backward compatibility don't go with each other well.
499.
by mateuszf 12y ago
I never disable javascript. Also no Ghostery.
500.
by mateuszf 12y ago
"Browsing" button on the main page doesn't work for. Firefox on OSX.
501.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Is the code open source? I don't think so.
502.
by mateuszf 12y ago
That's why React is brilliant, since it's really simple and scales well.
503.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Just wanted to say that this name is already used by (quite popular) emacs Clojure IDE plugin. https://github.com/clojure-emacs/cider
504.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Just wondering .. maybe it's used internally by the library?
505.
by mateuszf 12y ago
> But it's simply too young to warrant the same kind of investment that I have personally made into Angular. Sure .. it makes sense. Though one of the main selling points of React is that it's dead easy.
506.
by mateuszf 12y ago
React is just newer. Give it some time.
507.
by mateuszf 12y ago
> If other people prefer SystemV why don't they simply let them go? You are free to fork Debian and modify it as you wish.
508.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Just guessing - internet explorer under wine.
509.
by mateuszf 12y ago
All Clojure functions / values are instances of java classes (well maybe except java primitive types, but it's transparent).
510.
by mateuszf 12y ago
Java interop is quite simple. There is deftype mechanism similar to creating "normal" java classes, and defrecord similar to scala case classes.

More ›