mateuszf

36 ms·

391.
by mateuszf 11y ago
But you have to write them before using. It's not needed in case of the discussed feature.
392.
by mateuszf 11y ago
100% right code completion, call hierarchy, navigations, accurate safe refactorings. True, it is possible to use reflection (kind of metaprogramming) to call a method in Java too, but it's done sporadically because of various reasons.
393.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Yes, JetBrains IDE's for dynamically typed languages are pretty nice, but what they allow is still nothing compared what Intellij IDEA does for Java. And I'm saying this as a fan of Clojure which is not statically typed.
394.
by mateuszf 11y ago
The things you could do in Go vs in (Python | Ruby) are actually are results of difference between static vs dynamic typing. Yeah, static typing requires more key presses and some thinking, but in the case of tools (navigation, refactoring)
395.
by mateuszf 11y ago
For a powerful language with very good support of compilation to JS - you can try ClojureScript.
396.
by mateuszf 11y ago
For example - ports other than 443 and 80 are more often blocked.
397.
by mateuszf 11y ago
https://mitmproxy.org/ Works on all major os-es, although it may be bit harder to setup. Also handles transparent SSL interception.
398.
by mateuszf 11y ago
No support for livereload.
399.
by mateuszf 11y ago
How about .. have one db with log of events (cqrs style), the other one is transactional and transactions are being performed based on ordered events. When deploying new version - backup the transactional db and keep a pointer to the last e
400.
by mateuszf 11y ago
One reason is compatibility - it can be encoded to json and thus is handled by http proxies, etc. It is also human readable in encoded form.
401.
by mateuszf 11y ago
I'm not Common Lisper, but actually CL distribution is trivial compared to JVM (for user applications, not servers). It's possible to create native executables, which don't need any frameworks to exist on the target systems.
402.
by mateuszf 11y ago
> Currently i have capslock = escape when pressed alone, or control when pressed with another key. This is brilliant idea. And it works on OSX too - using http://apple.stackexchange.com/a/132569
403.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Regarding allowed changes in implementation: If user behaviour doesn't change - why changes in implementation are wrong? Reimplementations can use the source code at one place in time and use that as a reference.
404.
by mateuszf 11y ago
In the second story: The scribe showed that source code may be too detailed, but at the same time he showed that past view of the system will not accurate now if not updated constantly. Which is the point I'm making.
405.
by mateuszf 11y ago
> In any complex software project, there's always a difference between the contract described by the system's specification and the contract described by the software as implemented. That's exactly the reason why source it
406.
by mateuszf 11y ago
That's because if the code is over some quality level (which can be measured with bugs count) then the source itself is implementation documentation. And systemd contains the more classic documentation of its behaviour for its end user
407.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Who needs calculators? The same can be done "by hands". But the problem with that is that doing it many times is error prone. Why not let it be solved once for good?
408.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Even if it's undocumented (as far as I know it is well documented), at least this code is in one place.
409.
by mateuszf 11y ago
When it's done, you will have the value in orders variable. If you can do something with it - just do it in new line in the same scope. You can also use catch exceptions using standard try catch block.
410.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Unfortunately I'm on osx. But I already got used to coreutils, which are way more portable :)
411.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Total Commander is also written in Delphi. Such a great program I would still be using if I was on windows.
412.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Doesn't solve the versioning problem. That's a little disappointing.
413.
by mateuszf 11y ago
I'm not an expert, but as far as I know some factors are different between people, for example insulin resistance is inherited via genes.
414.
by mateuszf 11y ago
ReactNative with ClojureScript would not use a webview, but native components (at least on iOS)
415.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Ok, but it's the same feature as in other static typing languages, like C/C++/Java?
416.
by mateuszf 11y ago
What do you mean by refactoring? Automated tools to do that? Why would manual refactoring be better than let's say in more dynamic languages?
417.
by mateuszf 11y ago
ClojureScript + React Native would produce a native app.
418.
by mateuszf 11y ago
http://www.braveclojure.com/ is pretty good read.
419.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Well, maybe it's true that one has to rewrite the basic components for React. But then - it is one of rare "frameworks" where the components can be really isolated from themselves and compose at the same time.
420.
by mateuszf 11y ago
Without employing the poor, they would be even poorer.

More ›