masukomi

23 ms·

241.
by masukomi 4y ago
or to put it another way anyone who cares about ethics enough to take a job doing it is likely working at a large company whose corporate goals are directly opposed to the ethical limitations of AI because, right now, AIs tend to be biased
242.
by masukomi 4y ago
there's a key difference. labels are applied _after_ the message is _received_. Their solution applies the tags _before_ the message is _sent_. thus they're tagging the thread at the beginning of their interaction with it.
243.
by masukomi 4y ago
couldn't this be addressed to some reasonable agree by requiring someone to register their client and providing a fee schedule for "misbehavior" eg. if you send more than X requests per day per user you need to pay us $y per
244.
by masukomi 4y ago
> Would knowing if the creator of a product is like me or fully fledged organisation affect your likelihood of using any software they create? I use good software, that isn't written by bigots and doesn't support bigotry. I pre
245.
by masukomi 4y ago
it also has multiple accessibility issues for low vision users. I'd happily switch to a native client because using native widgets instead of HTML would likely address most, if not all, of my accessibility needs.
246.
by masukomi 4y ago
> You need to document, implement and maintaing hardening, have a process for regularly patching os and apps, monitor logs, have backup and disaster recovery procedures, regularly test the procedures... There are many hosts out there who
247.
by masukomi 4y ago
as an outsider (and thus potentially ignorant of pitfalls): I'm a big fan of the strategy to add transpilers to modern languages so that we can start writing new code in them, have them output COBOL, and then eventually have enough of
248.
by masukomi 4y ago
> Disables IPv6 by default. um... what'd i miss? Why would i want this?
249.
by masukomi 4y ago
meh. I never put db commands in it. i just used it for testing out crystal code ideas. the rerun everything from the beginning wasn't really a problem.
250.
by masukomi 4y ago
it's had an IRB-like REPL for years. It just wasn't built into the language. Admittedly it was limited compared to IRB but it was more than enough to test out quick ideas. It's called ICR: Interactive Crystal https:/&#x
251.
by masukomi 4y ago
i would bet good money that GitHub controls a non-profit whose purpose is to give money to open source devs. Otherwise every donation to a sponsor would be a loss because they're passing on 100% of the money†. If, however, they're
252.
by masukomi 4y ago
rather than, you know, actually removing a juvenile picture of animals copulating which pretty much guarantees no-one will take their project seriously. nah,... just add it to the faq
253.
by masukomi 4y ago
> In part I want to agree with you because I get the same version of random calls but for different reasons. But the truth is the difference between what we (or anyone) is doing and what google is doing is google makes plenty of money th
254.
by masukomi 4y ago
i don't see that it's functionally any different than what was displayed in that gif. In both cases there's a card to the longer content that needs to be clicked on. If your argument is that no-one will click on the card then
255.
by masukomi 4y ago
just as an FYI, someone made a tool specifically to preview what twitter was going to do for a card when you gave it a link: https://cards-dev.twitter.com/validator
256.
by masukomi 4y ago
thanks for this. saves me from wasting time on it.
257.
by masukomi 4y ago
yup. I was thinking the same thing.
258.
by masukomi 4y ago
a) cool b) looks actually well done c) already found something i'd consider d) Please do whatever you can to keep the "i made an amazon reseller blog site" type off of it. Every "buy my business" web site seems to
259.
by masukomi 4y ago
ultra-summary: they had specific needs for SQLite development, and nothing else was addressing them. It was _not_ intended to solve anyone else's problems. It's _probably_ not the right solution for _most_ devs. There's a goo
260.
by masukomi 4y ago
in general, if you're solving the same conflict over and over it's because of a common conflict resolution misconception / poor choice. let's say you have commits a->b->c->d you go to merge and there's a co
261.
by masukomi 4y ago
Is it accurate to say they're terrified of having the ability to repair farm equipment? I think it's probably more accurate to ask "How come we have a political system where the politicians are more beholden to the large comp
262.
by masukomi 4y ago
> Your credit score matters far less than you think. ... uh... this is the worst financial advice i have ever heard with regards to someone living in the US. credit scores aren't _just_ about if you get a loan or a credit card. The
263.
by masukomi 4y ago
> Do you think I would get severance if I tell them I refuse to relocate? that's entirely dependent upon the people enforcing this. They're absolutely not required to give _anyone_ severance _ever_. As this is a complete [redac
264.
by masukomi 4y ago
it wouldn't be a very _good_ feature because if it was, because there are SO MANY INSTANCES. Blocking one large one is not going to stop anything, and there's no pattern to domains, and .... just no. I mean yes, you could go &quot
265.
by masukomi 4y ago
I love people who think that they have any semblance of an idea of who will see or read their stuff. It's so pre-Gutenberg of them. ;) You don't have to write your things FOR EVERYONE but it isn't unreasonable to suggest tha
266.
by masukomi 4y ago
yup. was reading the readme and going .... "yes, but WHAT IS IT?!?!"
267.
by masukomi 4y ago
i had it already installed too. took a look at it and it now includes a 3d animation showing how you tie the knot. It's pretty good.
268.
by masukomi 4y ago
as an indie dev who is NOT a DevOps person i'd love more tooling that enabled me to configure AWS and have good safe defaults preset for me. Right now you really need to be a pro or spend a lot of time learning the nitty gritty configu
269.
by masukomi 4y ago
side question: how do you _get_ the code from this site. It _seems_ like it's a git repo of some sort, but i can't figure out what to clone. Is this just a ... representation of a git repo somewhere else? What am i missing?
270.
by masukomi 4y ago
this implies you won't be able to use Firefox, or Safari, to access Gmail unelss they're willing to fork over their source code and pay the $$$ because all of those are >...[an] app that requests access to restricted scope Goog

More ›