Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
martopix
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
421.
▲
by
martopix
6y ago
I was gonna say that it would be cool if you could ask for the meaning of your own made-up words, and you CAN! That's basically an infinite generator of Douglas Adams's "meaning of liff" style definitions. liff a s
422.
▲
by
martopix
6y ago
It reminds me simultaneously of Borges and Douglas Adams.
423.
▲
by
martopix
6y ago
Very similar: http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/
424.
▲
by
martopix
6y ago
You're thinking of a specific gravity scenario versus a specific acceleration scenario. But the equivalence is true, it was one of the things shown by Einstein.
425.
▲
by
martopix
6y ago
Another poster says that people shouldn't try to find interpretations, but just feelings, like for music. This is what I was responding to. If they're puzzles it's a different assumption.
426.
▲
by
martopix
6y ago
Sad post: a lot of work, a lot of nice data, zero explanation of what it means.
427.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
I think this is precisely the issue. A lot of contemporary art not only "means" nothing to a lot of people, but also "feels" like nothing to a lot of people. The problem I have with that kind of art is not it being non-b
428.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
I guess the previous poster meant obscure and unimportant _relative_ to Leonardo's production.
429.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
Also, smooth pasta is embarassing.
430.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
(unipi.it: University of Pisa)
431.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
I don't know how you cope. Less than 8, even just in one night, and my work is already affected.
432.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
I'm sorry to say this because you probably worked hard and did a good technical job. But as AI/DL experts we always need to think about ethical concerns related to our work, and I would not want to release code like this online fo
433.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
Looks like a beginner-level sklearn task. Linear regression would probably be ok, if not, there is random forest or a 2-layer perceptron. No use for a deep network.
434.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
I would definitely mention integer division as a massive change in py3 too. In my field, the @ multiplication operator is also useful.
435.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
Category -> search -> no results found.
436.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
Surely when you look at the sea and the sky you would think they're different colours? And yet sea blue and sky blue are both called 'blue' in English (but not in other languages).
437.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
Incidentally, in Italian I would call the two extreme colours in your image in two different ways: 'azzurro' (sky blue, light blue, etc) and 'blu' (dark blue, ultramarine, etc).
438.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
Awesome book, and one of the things I remember best about it is indeed about colours. He says historians of literature wondered whether ancient (homeric) Greeks were colourblind, since they describe the sea as "wine red"; but in f
439.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
I presume the code used for training has been selected among code released with specific licences. Otherwise it would be a copyright violation anyway.
440.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
The license only refers to the software, for what I understand, and doesn't say anything about the outputs. The completion runs on your machine unless you explicitly set up a cloud account. They explicitly explain how you can make sure
441.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
One thing doesn't exclude the other. TabNine also supports semantic completion. I haven't yet tried it in PyCharm, but I don't think it entirely overrides the powerful built-in autocompleter.
442.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
You should probably try TabNine ('autocompletion with deep learning'). It is trained on a compendium of pre-existing code, and suggests really sophisticated completions. Sometimes it freaks me out how it suggests solutions, almost
443.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
Indeed it's sex education. You get jocks and nerds, school lockers, the school canteen, all that, which is very american. It does irritate me a lot, but I have to say it's a really good show otherwise.
444.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
Do you?
445.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
That's not what the comment says...
446.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
I'm 30, and I didn't grow up with a microwave. My parents got one about 10 years ago, I think, and they don't use a kettle. I think it's the same for many people where I grew up. Not a poor country, but different cooki
447.
▲
by
martopix
7y ago
This is very true, don't get me wrong. But we have a problem, which is that scientists already need to be good (and efficient) at: - Doing research - Supervising students - Teaching - Giving talks in a clear way - Writing papers in a c