marta_morena_28

10 ms·

31.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
The only reason why I even still have to use windows is because of Adobe Lightroom. But perhaps I will look for alternatives. There is literally no other reason anymore. Microsoft has ruined their operating system.
32.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
> The Dark engineers What do you mean. The whole page talks about "I" and "me". That's going to go well...
33.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
TCP doesn't take care of packet loss. What TCP does is make sure your packets are not lost, even if you have 99% packet loss. On the flip-side, that means that if TCP can't deliver a single packet (say out of a billion), the whole
34.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Sad for them. Seeing Youtube on mobile makes me gag each time. There is more ads than content, how can anyone actually bear this?
35.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
> We can prioritize both, and frankly, life on Earth will be better the more we priotitize space exploration, not worse. This is a pretty baseless claim. Space exploration, within the next 50 years, will yield utterly nothing for humans
36.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Not sure that qualifies. But yeah I didn't think of it because actually I also don't have a long range zoom for my pro camera...
37.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
What exactly would you think a pro camera allows you to do? I have one (one that is 4-5 years older than my iPhone) and I am not sure there is a single thing it can do that I couldn't do with my iPhone12Pro or compact camera. Having s
38.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Flutter, or in other words: Will Google abandon this product before or after my company managed to migrate to it?
39.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
It's definitely rich that US Senators are asking "Who the hell elected you?", while they are busy gerrymandering, suppressing voters and actively dismantling democracy.
40.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
If you put a Dutchman into the car, it's a flying dutchman. I don't see why they couldn't just use "Flying Dutchman" as name for this car.
41.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Interesting, right? I wonder who actually reads all this filler material. If I can't seem to find what I was looking for on a website within one or two seconds I click back and check the next one. If everyone would do that, sites that
42.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
That anti-trust concern could easily be wiped out by giving non-Apple devices the chance to opt-out by paying a flat-fee of maybe 100$. Then they can say that Apple devices include this upfront cost already (which they kinda do, since they
43.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
The only thing that I would confuse Google Drive with is Google Chrome, because that one actually looks like a disk
44.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Those are not use cases, those are features. "This device can cook an apple into a perfect plasma." (feature)! Yeah but who needs it (use case)? Beings from the 5th dimension who eat plasma for breakfast. But even then you would s
45.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Small? I guess the set of people who think that a lumpsum of 15k is better than higher salary, might actually be big? 15k is more like a rounding error when it comes to tech salary. I am not even sure this would make any difference if they
46.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
It really doesn't sound complicated to find, unless you just have a handsoff approach to building things and just don't care as long as "something" comes out on the other end. What makes me wonder however is this: 40 min
47.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
It's actually even worse than that. Functional programming is on pretty much all accounts FASTER than imperative programming by design. Imperative programming heavily relies on state mutation and branching. FP relies on immutability, p
48.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Yeah that works for the first 1000 words perhaps. Then you run out of images to show. Many of the more complicated words simply can't be disambiguated by images. Learning words by translation is totally fine. The point is not to use th
49.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Probably means (A(text) XOR C(text)) or something. Then you would need to find a collision in both algorithms for the same input and that will be arguably much harder. I.e. just because someone demonstrates a lack of knowledge in his/h
50.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
That's a really bad example, giving that this thing will poison the ocean for millennia to come and stopped short just on the brink of becoming the next Chernobyl. If things had just turned out slightly differently, the reactor core co
51.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Possible, but far reaching. There are other explanations: * We are a computer simulation (hence there is no colonization, we are in an experiment) * There are like 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 habitable planets in the universe. Just because so
52.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Yeah, that has just little to do with the topic at hand. When you have a Facebook account, you sign a deal "your life for free stuff". Most people chose the free stuff. The only reason they can bring a suit at all is because peopl
53.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
How would known usage data help you decide how urgently customers want to use a new feature that doesn't exist yet?
54.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Same principle as "why vegans live healthier". It's not because their diet is actually healthier per-se, same as healing crystals do not work. But a vegan person, same as a person using healing crystals is likely to be a stro
55.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Does this have something to do with the patents/copyright Lego holds? How hard can it be to bake a piece of plastic into shape?
56.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
The main difference though is that gravitation (probably) doesn't have a mass of its own, while EM fields do. Plus, matter does not react to EM fields in the way it does towards gravitation. I.e. light is not "pulled" by EM f
57.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
So what you are saying is that if we assumed that all particles, including light are magnetic, and everything that has a mass, emits a corresponding magnetic field with a strength relative to its mass, we could not form a similar theory of
58.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Interesting approach, however it would need a mastermind to actually give a more convoluted explanation of the relatively simple idea behind their approach. You essentially have to read the entire thing to get the picture, while one sentenc
59.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
Yes except that IBM has revenue it generates from people (not) being there, while WeWork only loses money :D.
60.
by marta_morena_28 6y ago
less profitable wouldn't matter if the law would dictate that every device needs to support multiple vendors with feature parity and the user/owner of a device is legally entitled to use it in whatever way they see fit. Yes, this

More ›