marshallp

7 ms·

31.
by marshallp 14y ago
I'm not really being political. The OP said democrat fraud isn't getting attention on here, I simply pointed out it's more likely republicans would be committing fraud. That is all. I get it that republicans would "feel" offended, but that
32.
by marshallp 14y ago
Yeah, statistically, democrats are smarter than republicans. I must be smarter than average!
33.
by marshallp 14y ago
What? Are you denying Romnesia, or the lies that led to the Iraq war. Or Nixon's party. Or that the military-industrial xomplex and big oil is allied with republicans. Or Peter Norvig's analysis of who you should vote for http://norvig.com
34.
by marshallp 14y ago
The republicans are the party of liars. Who is more likely to actually commit these crimes? Republicans. Even the 4 votes thing you came up with is probably republicans spreading lies.
35.
by marshallp 14y ago
By that definition you could start claiming everything as blind luck. Why bother doing anything at all, let luck do the work.
36.
by marshallp 14y ago
I don't get that. It would be true if he just made a few trades, but the author claimed to be making 2000 trades a day. Over a period of months winning that wouldn't qualify as blind luck.
37.
by marshallp 14y ago
Like no other country has civil liberties. What does Canada or Western Europe have.
38.
by marshallp 14y ago
Yeah, but this isn't fix-it-in-mexico scam. This is potential med-tech that just needs big-money-mafia to make it rain.
39.
by marshallp 14y ago
The greatest group of political scientists? You're referring the founding fathers. Why didn't they institute proportional representation? Why did they have an electoral college? Why didn't they abolish slavery and institute women's vote rig
40.
by marshallp 14y ago
Are you saying it will never potentially be a cure? Maybe it isn't now, but with enough automated testing on mice or pigs etc. it will get to a mature point. This can also be parallelized, so maybe it can be done in a few months.
41.
by marshallp 14y ago
Why such drastic measures like giving up. As I said in another comment, too low a claim and people think it's not worthwhile, too high and it's crackpotty. How do I get to the right balance? Furthermore, I think the medical industry is full
42.
by marshallp 14y ago
I've made couple posts about it - including links - over the past week, still got downvotes. People are not realizing the unthinkable is actually thinkable.
43.
by marshallp 14y ago
I'm not saying it's available at your local walgreens. I'm just saying, like robot cars were a few years ago, it's an underinvested/underpromoted breakthrough sitting right under people's noses.
44.
by marshallp 14y ago
I think you're making that mistake a lot of people in medicine make and what separates them from the tech industry. They're huge pessimists because they don't grok things like physics or computing and are trained/selected for their ability
45.
by marshallp 14y ago
All it takes is a couple of clicks to get a huge list of researchers, including Harvard and John Hopkins http://www.fusfoundation.org/research/sites
46.
by marshallp 14y ago
http://www.fusfoundation.org/MRgFUS-Overview/about-focused-u... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-intensity_focused_ultrasou... http://bergcityuni.wordpress.com/projects/cardiac-ablation-u... (links to sites linking to university fund
47.
by marshallp 14y ago
There's some chinese comp selling $130 quadcops, linked to from diydrones
48.
by marshallp 14y ago
Focused ultrasound could have been used to do cardiac ablation as well, though it's probably still in experimental stage. It's also noninvasive. In general, focused ultrasound is the cure to a lot of ailments but is criminally underfunded
49.
by marshallp 14y ago
That may true, but I was just trying to point out the attitude of essentially "stealing" money by monopolizing is not good for society. Just add by relentlessly innovating and you might end up better off than sitting on a pile of money. The
50.
by marshallp 14y ago
How about instead creating barriers by innovating faster. More Elon Musk and less Mark Zuckerburg. The world needs more inventors and less monopolists.
51.
Google X Lab should open up
3 points by marshallp 14y ago|1 comments
52.
by marshallp 14y ago
It's almost certainly google's enemies having finally got through to the FTC. Google's made a lot of enemies, the telcos, microsoft, apple, big oil, big media. The population should wake up realize there's only a few good guys out there, go
53.
by marshallp 14y ago
I'll have to disagree with you on that. Genetics is the wrong approach to dealing with all this and was a wild goose chase. Regenerative medicine is the correct approach, the body has all the mechanisms already to regrow itself, after all,
54.
by marshallp 14y ago
He's given the typical FOOLISH response people give after brushes with the death plague - live life to the fullest. How about instead thinking of ways to fix the problem. That can also be considered - living life to fullest - and also fixin
55.
by marshallp 14y ago
Legalization is the best way to end it. The network analysis needs to occur about politicians in the rich countries, how to manipulate them into legalizing drugs. It's a lot easier to collect data on them and it's the actual root cause.
56.
by marshallp 14y ago
Yesh, I'm trying to intentionally seed HN with machine learning, robotics, immortality tech (focused ultrasound, radiosurgery) to break the web filter bubble. PG and his crew should be getting into the AI/biomed bubble.
57.
by marshallp 14y ago
That's why I submitted it. The new thing is robots but the mainstream still thinks web is the new tech. As people shift to mobile, the ad revenue won't be there, google's already experiencing this. The smart money's going to robotics, as it
58.
by marshallp 14y ago
The last kid getting overambitious with computers is now serving time in federal prison (Aaron Swartz). You might want to peace out on the hackz.
59.
China roboticizing(asia.cnet.com)
1 points by marshallp 14y ago|0 comments
60.
Chris Anderson Leaving Wired for Robots(nymag.com)
28 points by marshallp 14y ago|9 comments

More ›